These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10764100)

  • 1. Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.
    Kane MJ; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 10764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age differences in proactive interference, working memory, and abstract reasoning.
    Emery L; Hale S; Myerson J
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Sep; 23(3):634-45. PubMed ID: 18808252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of encoding and retrieval processes to proactive interference.
    Kliegl O; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1778-89. PubMed ID: 25603166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference.
    Szpunar KK; McDermott KB; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1392-9. PubMed ID: 18980403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive interference and practice effects in visuospatial working memory span task performance.
    Blalock LD; McCabe DP
    Memory; 2011 Jan; 19(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 21240750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.
    Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Jun; 129(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 10868332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
    Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Buildup and release from proactive interference in a rhesus monkey.
    Jitsumori M; Wright AA; Shyan MR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 2794869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory: activation limitations on retrieval.
    Anderson JR; Reder LM; Lebiere C
    Cogn Psychol; 1996 Jun; 30(3):221-56. PubMed ID: 8660785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory.
    Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN; Lafronza VN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1185-91. PubMed ID: 2530311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.
    Tehan G; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 7731363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of episodic coding, proactive interference, and list length effects in a running span verbal working memory task.
    Postle BR; Berger JS; Goldstein JH; Curtis CE; D'Esposito M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2001 Mar; 1(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 12467100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in proactive interference in verbal and visuospatial working memory.
    Lilienthal L
    Memory; 2017 Sep; 25(8):1110-1116. PubMed ID: 28090818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: mechanisms of change.
    Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 21264624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
    Kane MJ; Bleckley MK; Conway AR; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 11409097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.
    Bunting M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):183-196. PubMed ID: 16569140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing and storage in working memory span.
    Duff SC; Logie RH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 11216320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval plus scanning: does it occur?
    Brannelly S; Tehan G; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):712-22. PubMed ID: 2811668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.