These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10765248)

  • 1. The process of outcomes management in an acute care facility.
    Peters C; Cowley M; Standiford L
    Nurs Adm Q; 1999; 24(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 10765248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reflections on a decade of outcomes management in women's services.
    Houston S; Fleschler R; Luquire R
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2001; 30(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 11277166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Quality of Health Outcomes Model for guiding obstetrical practice.
    Mayberry LJ; Gennaro S
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2001; 33(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 11419309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Length of stay for uncomplicated vaginal birth: a perinatal continuous quality improvement project.
    Inturrisi M; Lambert L
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 1998 Jun; 12(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 9782873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using hospital performance data in quality improvement: the Cleveland Health Quality Choice experience.
    Rosenthal GE; Hammar PJ; Way LE; Shipley SA; Doner D; Wojtala B; Miller J; Harper DL
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 Jul; 24(7):347-60. PubMed ID: 9689568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing a hospital report card to demonstrate value in healthcare.
    Alsever RN; Ritchey T; Lima NP
    J Healthc Qual; 1995; 17(1):19-25, 28. PubMed ID: 10139390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.
    Smith JE; Fisher DL; Endorf-Olson JJ
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2000 May; 26(5):277-86. PubMed ID: 18350772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of care in reproductive health programmes: monitoring and evaluation of quality improvement.
    Kwast BE
    Midwifery; 1998 Dec; 14(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 10076314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Satisfaction with maternal and birth services: a survey in public hospitals in Turkey.
    Özkan Ş; Chiang C; Aba G; Çelik Y
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2020 Jul; 33(4-5):363-372. PubMed ID: 32840968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quality assessment of labor care provided in the Unified Health System in Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, 1999-2001].
    Oliveira MI; Dias MA; Cunha CB; Leal Mdo C
    Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Oct; 42(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 18833388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Case mix adjustment of health outcomes, resource use and process indicators in childbirth care: a register-based study.
    Mesterton J; Lindgren P; Ekenberg Abreu A; Ladfors L; Lilja M; Saltvedt S; Amer-Wåhlin I
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 27245845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complicated deliveries, critical care and quality in emergency obstetric care in Northern Tanzania.
    Olsen ØE; Ndeki S; Norheim OF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Oct; 87(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 15464791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines.
    Gimovsky AC; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):361.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26928148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.
    Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of care in birth centers. The National Birth Center Study.
    Rooks JP; Weatherby NL; Ernst EK; Stapleton S; Rosen D; Rosenfield A
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Dec; 321(26):1804-11. PubMed ID: 2687692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-sectional survey of California childbirth hospitals: implications for defining maternal levels of risk-appropriate care.
    Korst LM; Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):527.e1-527.e12. PubMed ID: 26196455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?
    Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; Korst LM; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):587.e1-587.e13. PubMed ID: 26026921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of the Optimality Index as a new approach to evaluating outcomes of maternity care.
    Murphy PA; Fullerton JT
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(6):770-8. PubMed ID: 17105643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
    Leeman L; Leeman R
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing standards for obstructed labour in a low-income country.
    Kongnyuy EJ; Mlava G; van den Broek N
    Rural Remote Health; 2008; 8(3):1022. PubMed ID: 18690763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.