These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10765456)

  • 1. Parameter uncertainty and variability in evaluative fate and exposure models.
    Hertwich EG; McKone TE; Pease WS
    Risk Anal; 1999 Dec; 19(6):1193-204. PubMed ID: 10765456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic uncertainty analysis of an evaluative fate and exposure model.
    Hertwich EG; McKone TE; Pease WS
    Risk Anal; 2000 Aug; 20(4):439-54. PubMed ID: 11051069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prioritizing chemicals and data requirements for screening-level exposure and risk assessment.
    Arnot JA; Brown TN; Wania F; Breivik K; McLachlan MS
    Environ Health Perspect; 2012 Nov; 120(11):1565-70. PubMed ID: 23008278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part II: assessing parameter uncertainty and human variability in the calculation of toxicity potentials.
    Huijbregts MA; Thissen U; Jager T; van de Meent D; Ragas AM
    Chemosphere; 2000 Aug; 41(4):575-88. PubMed ID: 10819226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scenario-model-parameter: a new method of cumulative risk uncertainty analysis.
    Moschandrea DJ; Karuchit S
    Environ Int; 2002 Sep; 28(4):247-61. PubMed ID: 12220111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the adequacy of maximum contaminant levels as health-protective cleanup goals: an analysis based on Monte Carlo techniques.
    Finley BL; Scott P; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):438-55. PubMed ID: 8128005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty in multi-media fate and transport models: a case study for TNT life cycle assessment.
    Mayo M; Collier ZA; Hoang V; Chappell M
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():104-12. PubMed ID: 25037048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertain numbers and uncertainty in the selection of input distributions--consequences for a probabilistic risk assessment of contaminated land.
    Sander P; Bergbäck B; Oberg T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1363-75. PubMed ID: 17054537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing predictive uncertainty in comparative toxicity potentials of triazoles.
    Golsteijn L; Iqbal MS; Cassani S; Hendriks HW; Kovarich S; Papa E; Rorije E; Sahlin U; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Feb; 33(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 24122976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Climate-based archetypes for the environmental fate assessment of chemicals.
    Ciuffo B; Sala S
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():435-43. PubMed ID: 23999273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geographical scenario uncertainty in generic fate and exposure factors of toxic pollutants for life-cycle impact assessment.
    Huijbregts MA; Lundi S; McKone TE; van de Meent D
    Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 12615102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review.
    Chowdhury S; Champagne P; McLellan PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1680-91. PubMed ID: 19167150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic interactions between hydrogeological and exposure parameters in daily dose prediction under uncertainty and temporal variability.
    Kumar V; de Barros FP; Schuhmacher M; Fernàndez-Garcia D; Sanchez-Vila X
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 1():197-206. PubMed ID: 24011618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the relevance of seasonal differentiation of human health intake fractions in life cycle assessment.
    Manneh R; Margni M; Deschênes L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):749-59. PubMed ID: 22488822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separation of uncertainty and interindividual variability in human exposure modeling.
    Ragas AM; Brouwer FP; Büchner FL; Hendriks HW; Huijbregts MA
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 18398446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of daily bisphenol a intake of Japanese individuals with emphasis on uncertainty and variability.
    Miyamoto K; Kotake M
    Environ Sci; 2006; 13(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 16685249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial variability versus parameter uncertainty in freshwater fate and exposure factors of chemicals.
    Nijhof CO; Huijbregts MA; Golsteijn L; van Zelm R
    Chemosphere; 2016 Apr; 149():101-7. PubMed ID: 26855212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does simplifying transport and exposure yield reliable results? An analysis of four risk assessment methods.
    Zhang Q; Crittenden JC; Mihelcic JR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Mar; 35(6):1282-8. PubMed ID: 11347945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model and input uncertainty in multi-media fate modeling: benzo[a]pyrene concentrations in Europe.
    Hauck M; Huijbregts MA; Armitage JM; Cousins IT; Ragas AM; van de Meent D
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jun; 72(6):959-67. PubMed ID: 18440046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.