BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10765581)

  • 1. Comparison of midwifery care to medical care in hospitals in the Quebec pilot projects study: clinical indicators. L'Equipe dEvaluation des Projets-Pilotes Sages-Femmes.
    Fraser W; Hatem-Asmar M; Krauss I; Maillard F; Bréart G; Blais R
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(1):I5-11. PubMed ID: 10765581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of midwifery services vs. medical services in Quebec. LEquipe dEvaluation des Projets-Pilotes Sages-Femmes.
    Reinharz D; Blais R; Fraser WD; Contandriopoulos AP
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(1):I12-5. PubMed ID: 10765582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the midwifery pilot projects in Quebec: an overview. L'Equipe d'Evaluation des Projets-Pilotes Sages-Femmes.
    Blais R; Joubert P
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(1):I1-4. PubMed ID: 10765580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of midwives into the Quebec health care system. L'Equipe d'Evaluation des Projets-Pilotes Sages-Femmes.
    Collin J; Blais R; White D; Demers A; Desbiens F
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(1):I16-20. PubMed ID: 10765583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Quebec midwifery experiment: lessons for Canada.
    Klein MC
    Can J Public Health; 2000; 91(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 10765572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled study of birth center care versus standard maternity care: effects on women's health.
    Waldenström U; Nilsson CA
    Birth; 1997 Mar; 24(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 9271963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking obstetric and midwifery practice with optimal outcomes.
    Cragin L; Kennedy HP
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 17105644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of midwife-led care provided at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital.
    Campbell R; Macfarlane A; Hempsall V; Hatchard K
    Midwifery; 1999 Sep; 15(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 10776243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.
    Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G; Foster J
    Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():53-61. PubMed ID: 27060401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Birth Outcomes of Women Using a Midwife versus Women Using a Physician for Prenatal Care.
    Loewenberg Weisband Y; Klebanoff M; Gallo MF; Shoben A; Norris AH
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jul; 63(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 29944777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Down the rabbit hole: examining outcomes of nurse midwifery care.
    Vincent D; Hastings-Tolsma M; Park JH
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2004; 19(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 15535542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized, controlled trial of nurse-midwifery care.
    Harvey S; Jarrell J; Brant R; Stainton C; Rach D
    Birth; 1996 Sep; 23(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 8924098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.
    Attanasio L; Kozhimannil KB
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jan; 63(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 29144586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes, safety, and resource utilization in a collaborative care birth center program compared with traditional physician-based perinatal care.
    Jackson DJ; Lang JM; Swartz WH; Ganiats TG; Fullerton J; Ecker J; Nguyen U
    Am J Public Health; 2003 Jun; 93(6):999-1006. PubMed ID: 12773368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the quality of documented care given by Swedish midwives during birth.
    Kvist LJ; Damiati N; Rosenqvist J; Sandin-Bojö AK
    Midwifery; 2011 Dec; 27(6):e188-94. PubMed ID: 20833458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study.
    Gidaszewski B; Khajehei M; Gibbs E; Chua SC
    Midwifery; 2019 Feb; 69():10-16. PubMed ID: 30390462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The utilization of a Midwifery Obstetrical Unit (MOU) in a Metropolitan area.
    Mashazi MI; Roos SD
    Curationis; 2000 Dec; 23(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 11949299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marion's message. Support nurse-midwives.
    McLean MT
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (69):7. PubMed ID: 15124310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.