These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10765617)

  • 41. [Promising results from mammography screening].
    Thurfjell E
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Mar; 92(12):1197-8. PubMed ID: 7707753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [WHO and The Lancet: yes to mammographic screening].
    Garne JP; Hessov I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jun; 164(23):3081-2; discussion 3082-3. PubMed ID: 12082868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Canadian mammography study to be reviewed by outside team.
    Smigel K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Mar; 87(6):413-4. PubMed ID: 7861460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Scientific foundation of mammographic screening is based on inconclusive research in Sweden.
    Sjönell G; Stâhle L
    BMJ; 1999 Jul; 319(7201):55. PubMed ID: 10390473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Screening with mammography--a critical attitude is supported by new findings].
    Andersson I; Janzon L
    Lakartidningen; 1988 Nov; 85(44):3666-9. PubMed ID: 3059110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Postoperative radiotherapy increases mortality in women with breast cancer diagnosed by mass screening].
    Gøtzsche PC; Olsen O
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jan; 98(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 11271572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Mammographic screening should not be affected by unfounded arguments].
    Dean PB
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Feb; 99(9):944-5. PubMed ID: 11962019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [The debate on mammography--the National Board of Health and Welfare is answering Sjonell and Stahle].
    Rosén M; Stenbeck M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):859-60. PubMed ID: 10741028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Unsatisfactory documentation of conclusions in guidelines on mammography].
    Lenner P; Jonsson H
    Lakartidningen; 1998 Jul; 95(28-29):3154-6. PubMed ID: 9700252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The results of mammography must be interpreted correctly even in a debate].
    Tabár L
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(34):2980. PubMed ID: 7650980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Malmö mammographic screening trial.
    Tabár L; Duffy S
    BMJ; 1989 Jan; 298(6665):48-9. PubMed ID: 2492859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [A final comment from the National Board of Health and Welfare: women--do attend the mammographic screening! A new group for analysis of the effects is being set up!].
    Rosén M; Rehnqvist N; Stenbeck M
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Apr; 96(15):1883. PubMed ID: 10319656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mammographic screening: no longer controversial.
    Cady B; Chung M
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2005 Feb; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15685026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mammographic screening.
    Davis DL; Love SM
    JAMA; 1994 Jan; 271(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 8264072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The mammography dilemma: a crisis for evidence-based medicine?
    Goodman SN
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):363-5. PubMed ID: 12204023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Mammography screening].
    Blichert-Toft M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Aug; 153(34):2367. PubMed ID: 1897055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Re: "A population-based case-cohort evaluation of the efficacy of mammographic screening for breast cancer".
    Langholz B; Thomas DC; Witte J; Peters RK
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 142(4):448-50. PubMed ID: 7625412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mammography at the crossroads.
    Mitchell H
    Med J Aust; 1987 Dec 7-21; 147(11-12):626. PubMed ID: 3696057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Some glipses from the history of mammography: from radiography of preparations to general screening].
    Andersson I
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1329-33. PubMed ID: 8656864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A reader's guide to the evaluation of screening studies.
    Earle C; Hebert PC
    Postgrad Med J; 1996 Feb; 72(844):77-83. PubMed ID: 8871456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.