These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10765629)

  • 1. [Mammographic screening--a comment to the debate].
    Lindberg MJ
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1452. PubMed ID: 10765629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A final comment from the National Board of Health and Welfare: women--do attend the mammographic screening! A new group for analysis of the effects is being set up!].
    Rosén M; Rehnqvist N; Stenbeck M
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Apr; 96(15):1883. PubMed ID: 10319656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Debate among researchers over mammography screening and the potential effect of that debate on screening in the United States.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(2):156. PubMed ID: 18182608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Overestimated cost savings by mammographic screening].
    Andersson I
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Aug; 93(32-33):2725. PubMed ID: 8801411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [SBU does not make statements on mammographic screening without basic data].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan; 93(3):117. PubMed ID: 8569313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The results of mammography must be interpreted correctly even in a debate].
    Tabár L
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(34):2980. PubMed ID: 7650980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mammographic service screening on stage at presentation of breast cancers in Sweden.
    Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2205-12. PubMed ID: 17471486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Promising results from mammography screening].
    Thurfjell E
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Mar; 92(12):1197-8. PubMed ID: 7707753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Sjönell and Ståhle give misleading information on mammography screening].
    Azavedo E; Svane G
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Dec; 97(51-52):6104, 6107. PubMed ID: 11195450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
    Duffy SW; Tabár L; Chen HH; Holmqvist M; Yen MF; Abdsalah S; Epstein B; Frodis E; Ljungberg E; Hedborg-Melander C; Sundbom A; Tholin M; Wiege M; Akerlund A; Wu HM; Tung TS; Chiu YH; Chiu CP; Huang CC; Smith RA; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Holmberg L
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mammography screening at the cross-roads--a proposal concerning the information to women].
    Sjönell G; Ståhle L
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Nov; 97(45):5150-3. PubMed ID: 11116898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Does organized mammographic screening reduce breast cancer mortality? The Cancer Registry's view on the current debate].
    Wang H; Hofvind S; Tretli S; Thoresen S; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Jan; 122(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 11873583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Participation in mammography screening depends on earlier contacts with health care services].
    Lagerlund M
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Oct; 98(42):4597. PubMed ID: 11715234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen].
    Dige U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr; 164(16):2177-8. PubMed ID: 11989065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
    Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Journalism on mammography one more time].
    Cederblom S
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1466. PubMed ID: 10765635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
    Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening mammography may not be effective at any age.
    Wilkerson BF; Schooff M
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 49(4):302, 371. PubMed ID: 10778833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clear-cut beneficial effect of breast cancer screening on the trend in breast-conserving surgery].
    van der Hage JA; van de Velde CJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jun; 146(22):1029-31. PubMed ID: 12073504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging.
    Berg WA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):895-906, vii. PubMed ID: 17888776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.