These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10765953)

  • 1. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite.
    Choi KK; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Dent Res; 2000 Mar; 79(3):812-7. PubMed ID: 10765953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities.
    Ferracane JL; Mitchem JC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 14579877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polymerization contraction stress in dual-cure cements and its effect on interfacial integrity of bonded inlays.
    Braga RR; Ferracane JL; Condon JR
    J Dent; 2002; 30(7-8):333-40. PubMed ID: 12554115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does single versus stepped curing of composite resins affect their shear bond strength?
    Caldwell R; Kulkarni G; Titley K
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2001 Nov; 67(10):588-92. PubMed ID: 11737983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins.
    Peris AR; Duarte S; de Andrade MF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12666857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composites and its correlation with microleakage in class V restorations.
    Calheiros FC; Sadek FT; Braga RR; Cardoso PE
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 15193790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesive.
    Perdigão J; Sezinando A; Gomes G
    Am J Dent; 2011 Aug; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 22016915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of two new dentin adhesives.
    Linden JJ; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9115676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations.
    Silva Santana SV; Bombana AC; Flório FM; Basting RT
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 20002927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.
    Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.