These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10766065)

  • 1. Biological cages.
    Janssen ME; Nguyen C; Beckham R; Larson A
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Feb; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S102-9. PubMed ID: 10766065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of allogenic cages in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Janssen ME; Lam C; Beckham R
    Eur Spine J; 2001 Oct; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S158-68. PubMed ID: 11716014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage.
    Matsumura A; Taneichi H; Suda K; Kajino T; Moridaira H; Kaneda K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E871-6. PubMed ID: 17077723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.
    Barsa P; Suchomel P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
    Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiological comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two closed-box plasmapore coated titanium cages: follow-up study over more than seven years.
    Kroppenstedt S; Gulde M; Schönmayr R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):2083-8. PubMed ID: 18758364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
    Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fusion rates and subsidence of morselized local bone grafted in titanium cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion using quantitative three-dimensional computed tomography scans.
    Lee JH; Jeon DW; Lee SJ; Chang BS; Lee CK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1460-5. PubMed ID: 20431435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF; Peterson MD; Parker SR; Roush TF; Bundy JV; Turner AW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of posterior instrumentation following PLIF with BAK cages is most pronounced in weak bone.
    Pitzen T; Matthis D; Steudel WI
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2002 Feb; 144(2):121-8; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 11862511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro biomechanical investigation: variable positioning of leopard carbon fiber interbody cages.
    Quigley KJ; Alander DH; Bledsoe JG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 18679101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of 1070 cases.
    Kimura H; Shikata J; Odate S; Soeda T; Yamamura S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):1164-9. PubMed ID: 22647991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of interbody fusion cage design on the stability of the instrumented spine in response to cyclic loading: an experimental study.
    Alkalay RN; Adamson R; Groff MW
    Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1867-1876. PubMed ID: 29526639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
    Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.