These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10766066)

  • 21. [A comparison study of interbody cage in lumbar degenerative disease].
    Liu HY; Zhou DG; Wang HM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 42(21):1316-8. PubMed ID: 15634433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Open versus endoscopic lumbar pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion in a sheep model: a feasibility study.
    Jahng TA; Fu TS; Kim DH
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 15363422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Mummaneni PV; Rodts GE
    Neurosurgery; 2005 Oct; 57(4 Suppl):256-61; discussion 256-61. PubMed ID: 16234672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biological cages.
    Janssen ME; Nguyen C; Beckham R; Larson A
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Feb; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S102-9. PubMed ID: 10766065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Ray Threaded Fusion Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Onesti ST; Ashkenazi E
    Neurosurgery; 1998 Jan; 42(1):200-4; discussion 204-5. PubMed ID: 9442526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure.
    Sasso RC; Kenneth Burkus J; LeHuec JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):1023-6. PubMed ID: 12768143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1.
    Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Wong AP; Khanna R; Barnawi A; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 23916495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous navigated guidewireless lumbosacral pedicle screw fixation.
    Chen KS; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jul; 41 Video Suppl 1():1. PubMed ID: 27364422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.
    Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.
    Wang X; Borgman B; Vertuani S; Nilsson J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 17(1):446. PubMed ID: 28655308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Surgical technique, outcomes and complications after a minimum of one year follow-up.
    Domínguez I; Luque R; Noriega M; Rey J; Alia J; Marco-Martínez F
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2017; 61(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 27919706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of fusion with one or two cages.
    Suh KT; Park WW; Kim SJ; Cho HM; Lee JS; Lee JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Oct; 90(10):1352-6. PubMed ID: 18827247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical Perspective-The Case for Adoption of LLIF.
    O'Brien JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 7():S33-4. PubMed ID: 27015072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental laparoscopic and thoracoscopic discectomy and instrumented spinal fusion. A feasibility study using a porcine model.
    Mühlbauer M; Ferguson J; Losert U; Koos WT
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 1998 Mar; 41(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9565956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of the laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar spinal fusion.
    Cowles RA; Taheri PA; Sweeney JF; Graziano GP
    Surgery; 2000 Oct; 128(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 11015092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Baek OK; Lee SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 19412026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perioperative surgical complications and learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institute experience.
    Park Y; Lee SB; Seok SO; Jo BW; Ha JW
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2015 Mar; 7(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 25729524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless (BERG) technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).
    Vazquez RM; Gireesan GT
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb; 17(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 12399833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
    Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.