BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10766505)

  • 1. Measurement of interrater agreement with adjustment for covariates.
    Barlow W
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):695-702. PubMed ID: 10766505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous estimation of intrarater and interrater agreement for multiple raters under order restrictions for a binary trait.
    Lester Kirchner H; Lemke JH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1761-72. PubMed ID: 12111910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement.
    Uebersax JS; Grove WM
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):823-35. PubMed ID: 10798855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quasi-symmetric latent class models, with application to rater agreement.
    Agresti A; Lang JB
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8513099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing rater agreement using marginal association models.
    Perkins SM; Becker MP
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1743-60. PubMed ID: 12111909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delta: a new measure of agreement between two raters.
    Andrés AM; Marzo PF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):1-19. PubMed ID: 15171798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Logistic regression of family data from retrospective study designs.
    Whittemore AS; Halpern J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 25(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 14557986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing observer agreement in studies involving replicated binary observations.
    Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):757-66. PubMed ID: 17613652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interval estimation under two study designs for kappa with binary classifications.
    Hale CA; Fleiss JL
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):523-34. PubMed ID: 8369386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explained variation for logistic regression.
    Mittlböck M; Schemper M
    Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(19):1987-97. PubMed ID: 8896134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of methods for calculating a stratified kappa.
    Barlow W; Lai MY; Azen SP
    Stat Med; 1991 Sep; 10(9):1465-72. PubMed ID: 1925174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Log-linear non-uniform association models for agreement between two ratings on an ordinal scale.
    Valet F; Guinot C; Mary JY
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(3):647-62. PubMed ID: 16538701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error.
    Roy S; Banerjee T
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing interrater agreement from dependent data.
    Williamson JM; Manatunga AK
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):707-14. PubMed ID: 9192459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.
    Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.
    Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. PubMed ID: 18227100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The log multinomial regression model for nominal outcomes with more than two attributes.
    Blizzard L; Hosmer DW
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):889-902. PubMed ID: 17849384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-rater agreement in judging errors in diagnostic reasoning.
    Hasnain M; Onishi H; Elstein AS
    Med Educ; 2004 Jun; 38(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 15189257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The kappa statistic was representative of empirically observed inter-rater agreement for physical findings.
    Gorelick MH; Yen K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):859-61. PubMed ID: 16828681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.