347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10767367)
1. Prospective analysis of DNA ploidy, proliferative index and epidermal growth factor receptor as prognostic factors for pretreated uterine cancer.
Nagai N; Oshita T; Fujii T; Kioka H; Katsube Y; Ohama K
Oncol Rep; 2000; 7(3):551-9. PubMed ID: 10767367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Flow cytometric evaluation of DNA ploidy pattern in uterine cancer].
Watanabe T; Izumi S; Yamaoka K; Tsutsui F; Nozawa S
Nihon Rinsho; 1992 Oct; 50(10):2432-8. PubMed ID: 1447814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of prognostic factors following flow-cytometric DNA analysis after cytokeratin labelling: II. Cervical and endometrial cancer.
Wimberger P; Hillemanns P; Kapsner T; Hepp H; Kimmig R
Anal Cell Pathol; 2002; 24(4-5):147-58. PubMed ID: 12590151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are DNA ploidy and epidermal growth factor receptor prognostic factors for untreated ovarian cancer? A prospective study.
Nagai N; Oshita T; Fujii T; Katsube Y; Matsubayashi S; Ohama K
Am J Clin Oncol; 2001 Jun; 24(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 11404488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic importance of DNA ploidy and DNA index in stage I and II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
Pradhan M; Abeler VM; Danielsen HE; Sandstad B; Tropé CG; Kristensen GB; Risberg BÅ
Ann Oncol; 2012 May; 23(5):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 21965471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA ploidy is stronger than lymph node metastasis as prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma: 10-year results of a prospective study.
Susini T; Olivieri S; Molino C; Amunni G; Rapi S; Taddei G; Scarselli G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 May; 21(4):678-84. PubMed ID: 21412157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prognostic evaluation of endometrial carcinoma by DNA content and histologic factors].
Shimizu K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Apr; 47(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 7730696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multivariable analysis of DNA ploidy, p53, and HER-2/neu as prognostic factors in endometrial cancer.
Lukes AS; Kohler MF; Pieper CF; Kerns BJ; Bentley R; Rodriguez GC; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL; Bast RC; Berchuck A
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(9):2380-5. PubMed ID: 7909491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year results of a prospective study on the prognostic role of ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: dNA aneuploidy identifies high-risk cases among the so-called 'low-risk' patients with well and moderately differentiated tumors.
Susini T; Amunni G; Molino C; Carriero C; Rapi S; Branconi F; Marchionni M; Taddei G; Scarselli G
Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):882-90. PubMed ID: 17262824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No prognostic impact of flow-cytometric measured DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in cancer of the uterine cervix: a prospective study of 465 patients.
Kristensen GB; Kaern J; Abeler VM; Hagmar B; Tropé CG; Pettersen EO
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Apr; 57(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 7705705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognostic significance of stage, tumor size, cellular atypia and DNA ploidy in uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Nordal RR; Kristensen GB; Kaern J; Stenwig AE; Pettersen EO; Tropé CG
Acta Oncol; 1995; 34(6):797-802. PubMed ID: 7576748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein overexpression in adenocarcinoma of Barrett's esophagus.
Nakamura T; Nekarda H; Hoelscher AH; Bollschweiler E; Harbeck N; Becker K; Siewert JR; Harbec N [corrected to Harbeck N]
Cancer; 1994 Apr; 73(7):1785-94. PubMed ID: 7907940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow cytometric analysis of uterine sarcoma: ploidy and S-phase rate as prognostic indicators.
Malmström H; Schmidt H; Persson PG; Carstensen J; Nordenskjöld B; Simonsen E
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Feb; 44(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 1544595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of DNA ploidy in endometrial cancer.
Ikeda M; Watanabe Y; Nanjoh T; Noda K
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8349160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA ploidy and steroid receptors as predictors of disease course in patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Iversen OE; Utaaker E; Skaarland E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1988; 67(6):531-7. PubMed ID: 3239384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between mutant p53 gene, DNA contents and conventional clinicopathological prognostic variables in cases with endometrial carcinoma.
Osmanağaoğlu MA; Kadioğlu S; Osmanağaoğlu S; Bozkaya H; Reis A; Tekelioğlu Y
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 15755004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in stage I endometrial carcinoma.
Pfisterer J; Kommoss F; Sauerbrei W; Rendl I; Kiechle M; Kleine W; Pfleiderer A
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 7622098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cell proliferation, measured as flow cytometric S-phase fraction, is a strong prognostic indicator in FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: a population-based study.
Green RW; Engblom S; Baldetorp B; Hartman L; Måsbäck A; Bjurberg M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Oct; 94(10):1064-73. PubMed ID: 26123703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The study of DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor in uterine cervical cancer].
Watanabe Y; Ikeda M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Sep; 44(9):1127-34. PubMed ID: 1453042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA ploidy analysis of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a flow cytometry from paraffin-embedded tissues.
Takahashi Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Oct; 42(10):1339-44. PubMed ID: 1700035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
