62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10769948)
1. Relative effectiveness of electrically- vs mechanically-elicited EMGs in detecting pedicle wall perforation and surgically-induced nerve root damage.
Kobara N; Owen JH; Kostuik J; Huckell C; Tooke SM
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 2000 Feb; 91(2):40-54. PubMed ID: 10769948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recording diffusion responses from contralateral intercostal muscles after stimulus-triggered electromyography: refining a tool for the assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement in an experimental porcine model.
de Blas G; Burgos J; Regidor I; Barrios C; Solá R; García-Urquiza S; Hevia E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):E391-6. PubMed ID: 19444052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurophysiological monitoring of lumbosacral spinal roots during spinal surgery: continuous intraoperative electromyography (EMG).
Santiago-Pérez S; Nevado-Estévez R; Aguirre-Arribas J; Pérez-Conde MC
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(7-8):361-7. PubMed ID: 18051630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative efficacy of transcranial motor evoked potentials, mechanically-elicited electromyography, and evoked EMG to assess nerve root function during sustained retraction in a porcine model.
Lyon R; Lieberman JA; Feiner J; Burch S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):E558-64. PubMed ID: 19770598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spinal somatosensory evoked potential evaluation of acute nerve-root injury associated with pedicle-screw placement procedures: an experimental study.
Jou IM; Hsu CC; Chern TC; Chen WY; Dau YC
J Orthop Res; 2003 Mar; 21(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 12568971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanically elicited nerve root discharge: mechanical irritation and waveform.
Obi T; Mochizuki M; Isobe K; Mizoguchi K; Takatsu M; Nishimura Y
Acta Neurol Scand; 1999 Sep; 100(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 10478583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition: analysis of 4857 screws.
Raynor BL; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Taylor BA; Padberg AM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2673-8. PubMed ID: 18007243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Harms technique of C1-C2 fixation with polyaxial screws and rods].
Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Kryl J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15860148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery.
Papadopoulos EC; Girardi FP; Sama A; Sandhu HS; Cammisa FP
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):263-7; discussion 268. PubMed ID: 15863081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using triggered electromyographic threshold in the intercostal muscles to evaluate the accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement (T3-T6).
Rodriguez-Olaverri JC; Zimick NC; Merola A; De Blas G; Burgos J; Piza-Vallespir G; Hevia E; Vicente J; Sanper I; Domenech P; Regidor I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):E194-7. PubMed ID: 18379388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurophysiologic monitoring of spinal nerve root function during instrumented posterior lumbar spine surgery.
Bose B; Wierzbowski LR; Sestokas AK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jul; 27(13):1444-50. PubMed ID: 12131744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study.
Welch WC; Rose RD; Balzer JR; Jacobs GB
J Neurosurg; 1997 Sep; 87(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 9285605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evoked and spontaneous electromyography to evaluate lumbosacral pedicle screw placement.
Clements DH; Morledge DE; Martin WH; Betz RR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Mar; 21(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 8852316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuous EMG recordings and intraoperative electrical stimulation for identification and protection of cervical nerve roots during foraminal tumor surgery.
Guo L; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Yingling CD; Weinstein PR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Feb; 19(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 16462217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative multimodality monitoring in adult spinal deformity: analysis of a prospective series of one hundred two cases with independent evaluation.
Quraishi NA; Lewis SJ; Kelleher MO; Sarjeant R; Rampersaud YR; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(14):1504-12. PubMed ID: 19483667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does EMG (dry needling) reduce myofascial pain symptoms due to cervical nerve root irritation?
Chu J
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Aug; 37(5):259-72. PubMed ID: 9298338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of mechanically elicited electromyograms to protect nerve roots during surgery for spinal degeneration.
Owen JH; Kostuik JP; Gornet M; Petr M; Skelly J; Smoes C; Szymanski J; Townes J; Wolfe F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Aug; 19(15):1704-10. PubMed ID: 7973964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Focal hole versus screw stimulation to prevent false negative results in detecting pedicle breaches during spinal instrumentation.
Troni W; Benech CA; Perez R; Tealdi S; Berardino M; Benech F
Clin Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 130(4):573-581. PubMed ID: 30611630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance.
Bledsoe JM; Fenton D; Fogelson JL; Nottmeier EW
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):817-21. PubMed ID: 19664966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated intraoperative EMG testing during percutaneous pedicle screw placement.
Ozgur BM; Berta S; Khiatani V; Taylor WR
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 17088202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
