These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10770009)

  • 1. Efficacy of bonded and nonbonded amalgam in the treatment of teeth with incomplete fractures.
    Davis R; Overton JD
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Apr; 131(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 10770009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Agnihotry A; Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD007517. PubMed ID: 26954446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The integrity of bonded amalgam restorations: a clinical evaluation after five years.
    Mach Z; Regent J; Staninec M; Mrklas L; Setcos JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Apr; 133(4):460-7; quiz 493. PubMed ID: 11991463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different treatment protocols for different pulpal and periapical diagnoses of 72 cracked teeth.
    Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho SB; Lee GO; Yang SE
    J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 23522534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of bonded composite restorations in the treatment of painful, cracked teeth: six-month clinical evaluation.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JM
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 12877415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusal veneer restoration treatment outcomes of cracked tooth syndrome: A 22.4-month follow-up study.
    Zhao W; Luo J; Zhang S; Zhang Z; Su Z; Fu B; Jin X
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jun; 28(7):368. PubMed ID: 38862733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of factors associated with cracked teeth.
    Seo DG; Yi YA; Shin SJ; Park JW
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 22341061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
    Mahler DB; Engle JH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
    Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 4- to 6-year retrospective clinical study of cracked teeth restored with bonded indirect resin composite onlays.
    Signore A; Benedicenti S; Covani U; Ravera G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 18069370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seven-year clinical evaluation of painful cracked teeth restored with a direct composite restoration.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Loomans BA; Bronkhorst EM
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):808-11. PubMed ID: 18570984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
    Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Systematic Review of Amalgam Bonded Restorations: In vitro and Clinical Findings.
    Brian HC; Lam OL; Jagannathan N; Botelho MG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1013-1024. PubMed ID: 30150506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.