These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10770023)

  • 41. Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for severe male infertility.
    Pinheiro RC; Lambert J; Bénard F; Mauffette F; Miron P
    CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(11):1397-401. PubMed ID: 10906893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of assisted reproductive technology on the incidence of multiple-gestation infants: a population perspective.
    Scholten I; Chambers GM; van Loendersloot L; van der Veen F; Repping S; Gianotten J; Hompes PG; Ledger W; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 25439839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ART: iatrogenic multiple pregnancy?
    Verberg MF; Macklon NS; Heijnen EM; Fauser BC
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 17074535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assisted reproduction technology, multiple births, and adverse perinatal outcome.
    Yu VY
    Croat Med J; 1998 Jun; 39(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 9575278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of human sperm chromatin status after selection using a modified Diff-Quik stain indicates embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization.
    Tavares RS; Silva AF; Lourenço B; Almeida-Santos T; Sousa AP; Ramalho-Santos J
    Andrology; 2013 Nov; 1(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 24124136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ongoing twin pregnancy after rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection of unfertilized abnormal oocytes.
    Esfandiari N; Claessens EA; Burjaq H; Gotlieb L; Casper RF
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):199.e5-7. PubMed ID: 18329024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assisted reproductive technologies in Italy, 2005-2007: results from the Italian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Scaravelli G; Vigiliano V; Bolli S; De Luca R; Mayorga JM; Fiaccavento S; Spoletini R; D'Aloja P
    Minerva Ginecol; 2012 Dec; 64(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 23232536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Some ethical and legal issues in assisted reproductive technology.
    Dickens BM; Cook RJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Jul; 66(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10458555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Technological advancement and human reproduction: where can we go or where do we want to go?
    Di Renzo GC; Caserta G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Jul; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 14563084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    ; Andersen AN; Gianaroli L; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1680-97. PubMed ID: 16585126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    Nyboe Andersen A; Gianaroli L; Nygren KG; ;
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Mar; 19(3):490-503. PubMed ID: 14998942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The public health implications of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Deonandan R
    Chronic Dis Can; 2010 Sep; 30(4):119-24. PubMed ID: 20946712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies.
    Caserta D; Bordi G; Stegagno M; Filippini F; Podagrosi M; Roselli D; Moscarini M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Mar; 174():64-9. PubMed ID: 24405729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Damaged babies from assisted reproductive technologies: focus on the BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) outcome.
    Healy D;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):512-3, discussion 526. PubMed ID: 15037392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Clinical experience with assisted reproductive technology along the development of micro fertilization].
    Miyazaki K
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2000 Aug; 46(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 11019380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Infertility and bioethical issues of the new reproductive technologies.
    Herz EK
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 12(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 2652103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Embryo production in dogs: from in vitro fertilization to cloning.
    Luvoni GC; Chigioni S; Beccaglia M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Aug; 41(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16869883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.