These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10770235)

  • 1. The effects of target and distractor familiarity on visual search in anxious children: latent inhibition and novel pop-out.
    Lubow RE; Toren P; Laor N; Kaplan O
    J Anxiety Disord; 2000; 14(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 10770235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search in schizophrenia: latent inhibition and novel pop-out effects.
    Lubow RE; Kaplan O; Abramovich P; Rudnick A; Laor N
    Schizophr Res; 2000 Sep; 45(1-2):145-56. PubMed ID: 10978882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of target and distractor familiarity on visual search in de novo Parkinson's disease patients: latent inhibition and novel pop-out.
    Lubow RE; Dressler R; Kaplan O
    Neuropsychology; 1999 Jul; 13(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 10447302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search as a function of type of prior experience with target and distractor.
    Lubow RE; Kaplan O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 9157182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance on the visual search analog of latent inhibition is modulated by an interaction between schizotypy and gender.
    Lubow RE; Kaplan O; De la Casa G
    Schizophr Res; 2001 Dec; 52(3):275-87. PubMed ID: 11705721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.
    Shen J; Reingold EM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 11414134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search.
    Wang Q; Cavanagh P; Green M
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7991347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do synaesthetic colours act as unique features in visual search?
    Edquist J; Rich AN; Brinkman C; Mattingley JB
    Cortex; 2006 Feb; 42(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 16683496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latent inhibition in ADHD adults on and off medication: a preliminary study.
    Lubow RE; Kaplan O; Manor I
    J Atten Disord; 2014 Oct; 18(7):625-31. PubMed ID: 22660915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-down inhibition of search distractors in parallel visual search.
    Müller HJ; von Mühlenen A; Geyer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1373-88. PubMed ID: 18078228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing emotional facial expressions influences performance on a Go/NoGo task in pediatric anxiety and depression.
    Ladouceur CD; Dahl RE; Williamson DE; Birmaher B; Axelson DA; Ryan ND; Casey BJ
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1107-15. PubMed ID: 17076749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast responses to neglected targets in visual search reflect pre-attentive processes: an exploration of response times in visual neglect.
    Laeng B; Brennen T; Espeseth T
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1622-36. PubMed ID: 11985844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.
    Harris IM; Benito CT; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 20718560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of visual selective attention is related to the type of target.
    Cheal M; Chastain G
    Psychol Res; 2002 May; 66(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 12132113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discriminability and dimensionality effects in visual search for featural conjunctions: a functional pop-out.
    Dehaene S
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2755764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.
    Yang H; Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 19304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.