These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10771180)

  • 1. Cochlear microphonics and otoacoustic emissions in chronically de-efferented chinchilla.
    Zheng XY; McFadden SL; Henderson D; Ding DL; Burkard R
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):14-22. PubMed ID: 10771180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma.
    Zheng XY; Henderson D; Hu BH; Ding DL; McFadden SL
    Hear Res; 1997 May; 107(1-2):147-59. PubMed ID: 9165355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear de-efferentation and impulse noise-induced acoustic trauma in the chinchilla.
    Zheng XY; McFadden SL; Ding DL; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 144(1-2):187-95. PubMed ID: 10831877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potentials.
    Zheng XY; Ding DL; McFadden SL; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):76-88. PubMed ID: 9387987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for multiple DPOAE components based upon group delay of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion in the gerbil.
    Faulstich M; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 140(1-2):99-110. PubMed ID: 10675638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects on cochlear responses of activation of descending pathways from the inferior colliculus.
    Mulders WH; Robertson D
    Hear Res; 2000 Nov; 149(1-2):11-23. PubMed ID: 11033243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation].
    Nieschalk M; Beneking R; Stoll W
    HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of olivocochlear bundle transection on tuning curves and acoustic distortion products.
    Littman TA; Cullen JK; Bobbin RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1945-52. PubMed ID: 1401539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of electrical stimulation of olivocochlear fibers in cochlear potentials in the chinchilla.
    Elgueda D; Delano PH; Robles L
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 12(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 21365333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels.
    Wolter NE; Harrison RV; James AL
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24335024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Zheng XY; Henderson D; McFadden SL; Hu BH
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):191-203. PubMed ID: 9119763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of industrial noise exposure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea--long term experiments in awake guinea pigs.
    Emmerich E; Richter F; Reinhold U; Linss V; Linss W
    Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 148(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 10978821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of kainic acid on the cochlear potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla.
    Zheng XY; Wang J; Salvi RJ; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 95(1-2):161-7. PubMed ID: 8793517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory nerve fiber responses following chronic cochlear de-efferentation.
    Zheng XY; Henderson D; McFadden SL; Ding DL; Salvi RJ
    J Comp Neurol; 1999 Mar; 406(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 10100893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency specificity and left-ear advantage of medial olivocochlear efferent modulation: a study based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission.
    Xing D; Gong Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):775-778. PubMed ID: 28538522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporary DPOAE level shifts, ABR threshold shifts and histopathological damage following below-critical-level noise exposures.
    Harding GW; Bohne BA
    Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 196(1-2):94-108. PubMed ID: 15464306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.