These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10771197)

  • 1. Noise suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. A comparison with the non-linear method.
    Molenaar DG; Shaw G; Eggermont JJ
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):197-207. PubMed ID: 10771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Derived narrow-band contributions.
    Molenaar DG; Shaw G; Eggermont JJ
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):208-22. PubMed ID: 10771198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction.
    Arslan RB; Ozdamar O; Ulgen Y
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 11409763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Bennett CL; Özdamar Ö
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1833-44. PubMed ID: 20968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Yates GK; Withnell RH
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):49-64. PubMed ID: 10511624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):499. PubMed ID: 28147608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analyzing transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions by concentration of frequency and time.
    Wu HT; Liu YW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):448. PubMed ID: 30075682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression.
    Stuart A; Cobb KM
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():35-42. PubMed ID: 26431768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-frequency transient evoked otoacoustic emissions acquisition with auditory canal compensated clicks using swept-tone analysis.
    Bennett CL; Ozdamar O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2410-9. PubMed ID: 20370024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat.
    Khvoles R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):120-6. PubMed ID: 8844192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of noise bandwidth on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Velenovsky DS; Glattke TJ
    Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 164(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 11950523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1949. PubMed ID: 27914441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive filter based two-probe noise suppression system for transient evoked otoacoustic emission detection.
    Subotić M; Šarić Z; Jovičić ST
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 40(3):637-47. PubMed ID: 22009312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Patrick Feeney M; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Sanford CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):399. PubMed ID: 29390789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission with unexpectedly short latency.
    Kruglov AV; Artamasov SV; Frolenkov GI; Tavartkiladze GA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Mar; 117(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 9105442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emission thresholds recorded conventionally and using maximum length sequences.
    Hine JE; Ho CT; Slaven A; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 156(1-2):104-14. PubMed ID: 11377886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.