These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10774131)

  • 1. A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: auditory icons.
    Belz SM; Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 10774131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory displays as occasion setters.
    Mckeown D; Isherwood S; Conway G
    Hum Factors; 2010 Feb; 52(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 20653225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Looming auditory collision warnings for driving.
    Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21469534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone.
    Mohebbi R; Gray R; Tan HZ
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 19634313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application.
    Graham R
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1233-48. PubMed ID: 10503056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices.
    Dingus TA; McGehee DV; Manakkal N; Jahns SK; Carney C; Hankey JM
    Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):216-29. PubMed ID: 9302889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid drivers.
    Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 15359683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transit bus operator performance and attitudes toward a collision warning system: results of a simulator experiment.
    Reinach SJ; Everson JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Sep; 6(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 16087466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of Essential Acoustic Parameters for Highly Urgent In-Vehicle Collision Warnings.
    Lewis BA; Eisert JL; Baldwin CL
    Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):248-261. PubMed ID: 29131661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance.
    Ben-Yaacov A; Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 12452277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping candidate within-vehicle auditory displays to their referents.
    McKeown D; Isherwood S
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):417-28. PubMed ID: 17552306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 18074709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.