These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10774838)

  • 1. The mental state at the time of the offense measure: its validation and admissibility under Daubert.
    Rogers R; Shuman DW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(1):23-8; discussion 29-32. PubMed ID: 10774838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary on "The mental state at the time of the offense measure": should we ever screen for insanity.
    Foote WE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 10774839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
    Krauss DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Criminal responsibility in schizophrenia with special attention to the mental state during the criminal act--a study based upon the activation-recurrence phenomenon].
    Higashi T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(7):762-88. PubMed ID: 19827562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Rethinking criminal responsibility: practical application of operational diagnosis and gnostic into expert testimony].
    Okada T
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(9):920-35. PubMed ID: 16305187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?
    Lally SJ
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: does it meet the Daubert standard?
    Rogers R; Salekin RT; Sewell KW
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Aug; 23(4):425-43. PubMed ID: 10439726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetics, antisocial personality, and criminal responsibility.
    Dinwiddie SH
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8891325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary: sex offenders and insanity.
    O'Shaughnessy RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):451-3. PubMed ID: 18086737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with a successful insanity plea.
    Steadman HJ; Keitner L; Braff J; Arvanites TM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Apr; 140(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 6837773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuropsychiatry at the Courtroom Gates: Selective Entry or Anything Goes?
    Brakel SJ; Gonzalez ER; Cavanaugh JL
    Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry; 1996 Jul; 1(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 10320423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epileptic automatisms in the criminal courts: 13 cases tried in England and Wales between 1975 and 2001.
    Reuber M; Mackay RD
    Epilepsia; 2008 Jan; 49(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 17727668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alcohol-induced sleepwalking or confusional arousal as a defense to criminal behavior: a review of scientific evidence, methods and forensic considerations.
    Pressman MR; Mahowald MW; Schenck CH; Bornemann MC
    J Sleep Res; 2007 Jun; 16(2):198-212. PubMed ID: 17542950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations Using Neuroimaging to Reconstruct Mental State After a Crime.
    Vitacco MJ; Randolph AM; Nelson Aguiar RJ; Porter Staats ML
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Oct; 30(4):694-701. PubMed ID: 34702412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.