BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10775526)

  • 1. The impact of transmission-ratio distortion on allele sharing in affected sibling pairs.
    Greenwood CM; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2001-4. PubMed ID: 10775526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transmission-ratio distortion and allele sharing in affected sib pairs: a new linkage statistic with reduced bias, with application to chromosome 6q25.3.
    Lemire M; Roslin NM; Laprise C; Hudson TJ; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):571-86. PubMed ID: 15322985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multipoint linkage analysis of the pseudoautosomal regions, using affected sibling pairs.
    Dupuis J; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Aug; 67(2):462-75. PubMed ID: 10869236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Down-weighting of multiple affected sib pairs leads to biased likelihood-ratio tests, under the assumption of no linkage.
    Greenwood CM; Bull SB
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1248-52. PubMed ID: 10090918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploiting excess sharing: a more powerful test of linkage for affected sib pairs than the transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Wicks J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2005-8. PubMed ID: 10788332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of tests for association and linkage in incomplete families.
    Cervino AC; Hill AV
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 10841813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The transmission/disequilibrium test for linkage on the X chromosome.
    Ho GY; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1158-60. PubMed ID: 10712228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk.
    Rybicki BA; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):593-604. PubMed ID: 10677319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.
    Xu X; Weiss S; Xu X; Wei LJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):1025-8. PubMed ID: 10961909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonpaternity in linkage studies of extremely discordant sib pairs.
    Neale MC; Neale BM; Sullivan PF
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):526-9. PubMed ID: 11745068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory.
    Whittemore AS; Tu IP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using discordant sib pairs to map loci for qualitative traits with high sibling recurrence risk.
    Rogus JJ; Krolewski AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Dec; 59(6):1376-81. PubMed ID: 8940283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
    Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A confidence-set approach for finding tightly linked genomic regions.
    Lin S; Rogers JA; Hsu JC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 11309687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A note on power approximations for the transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Knapp M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 10090903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.