BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10776925)

  • 1. Comparison of four methods of assessing root surface debridement.
    Chan YK; Needleman IG; Clifford LR
    J Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 71(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 10776925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of EDTA gel conditioning exposure time on periodontitis-affected human root surfaces: surface topography and PDL cell adhesion.
    Gamal AY; Mailhot JM
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Jan; 5(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 12666951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth.
    Wylam JM; Mealey BL; Mills MP; Waldrop TC; Moskowicz DC
    J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8295086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical and chemical root preparation in vitro: efficiency of plaque and calculus removal.
    Eschler BM; Rapley JW
    J Periodontol; 1991 Dec; 62(12):755-60. PubMed ID: 1722511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
    Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.
    Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D
    J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts.
    Dragoo MR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1992; 12(4):310-23. PubMed ID: 1428611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study.
    Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J
    Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histologic evaluation of three methods of periodontal root surface treatment in humans.
    Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 15857084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The penetration of lavage solution into the periodontal pocket during ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Nosal G; Scheidt MJ; O'Neal R; Van Dyke TE
    J Periodontol; 1991 Sep; 62(9):554-7. PubMed ID: 1658291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
    Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The periodontally-involved root surface.
    Corbet EF; Vaughan AJ; Kieser JB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Jul; 20(6):402-10. PubMed ID: 8349832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative in vitro effectiveness of closed root debridement with fine instruments on specific areas of mandibular first molar furcations. I. Root trunk and furcation entrance.
    Otero-Cagide FJ; Long BA
    J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 9407402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature].
    Deblauwe BM; van der Weijden GA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Jul; 99(7):239-44. PubMed ID: 11819997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.
    Drisko CL
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1993; ():78-88. PubMed ID: 8401851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculus removal from multirooted teeth with and without surgical access. (I). Efficacy on external and furcation surfaces in relation to probing depth.
    Parashis AO; Anagnou-Vareltzides A; Demetriou N
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 20(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 8421119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing.
    Hunter RK; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1984 Dec; 55(12):697-703. PubMed ID: 6394737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.