These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10777023)

  • 1. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children.
    Hughes ML; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Wolaver AA; Gervais JP
    Ear Hear; 2000 Apr; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 10777023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults.
    Brown CJ; Hughes ML; Luk B; Abbas PJ; Wolaver A; Gervais J
    Ear Hear; 2000 Apr; 21(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 10777022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.
    Hughes ML; Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Kelsay DM; Teagle HF; Lowder MW
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):471-86. PubMed ID: 11770670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant.
    Mason SM; Cope Y; Garnham J; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11694097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between NRT measurement and behavioural levels in patients with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant.
    Di Nardo W; Ippolito S; Quaranta N; Cadoni G; Galli J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Oct; 23(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 15108484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.
    Smoorenburg GF; Willeboer C; van Dijk JE
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):335-47. PubMed ID: 12401965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Gantz BJ
    Am J Otol; 1998 May; 19(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 9596182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device.
    Franck KH; Norton SJ
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):289-99. PubMed ID: 11527036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T; Naito Y; Hirai T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees.
    Raghunandhan S; Ravikumar A; Kameswaran M; Mandke K; Ranjith R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 24606544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
    Vlahović S; Šindija B; Aras I; Glunčić M; Trotić R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NRT-based versus behavioral-based MAP: a comparison of parameters and speech perception in young children.
    Kaplan-Neeman R; Henkin Y; Yakir Z; Bloch F; Berlin M; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):57-69. PubMed ID: 15485130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural response telemetry measures in patients implanted with Nucleus 24.
    Guedes MC; Brito Neto RV; Gomez MV; Sant'Anna SB; Peralta CG; Castilho AM; Bento RF
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):660-7. PubMed ID: 16612529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential.
    Franck KH
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):67S-71S. PubMed ID: 11883769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds in nucleus CI24R cochlear implant recipients.
    Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Brown CJ; Clay KS; Seyle K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Sep; 13(8):416-27. PubMed ID: 12371659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.