182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10777032)
1. Measurement variation among 12 electronic home blood pressure monitors.
Yarows SA; Brook RD
Am J Hypertens; 2000 Mar; 13(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 10777032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Omron HEM-637 wrist monitor to the auscultation method with the wrist position sensor on or disabled.
Yarows SA
Am J Hypertens; 2004 Jan; 17(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 14700513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Omron HBP-1300 professional blood pressure monitor based on auscultation in children and adults.
Meng L; Zhao D; Pan Y; Ding W; Wei Q; Li H; Gao P; Mi J
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Jan; 16():9. PubMed ID: 26758197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Omron MX3 Plus monitor for blood pressure measurement in adolescents.
Christofaro DG; Casonatto J; Polito MD; Cardoso JR; Fernandes R; Guariglia DA; Gerage AM; de Oliveira AR
Eur J Pediatr; 2009 Nov; 168(11):1349-54. PubMed ID: 19221789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The evaluation of a self-measurement arterial pressure monitor: the OMRON-HM 722C].
Córdoba R; Fuertes MI; Alvarez A; Molina I; Solans R; Melero I
Aten Primaria; 1997 Sep; 20(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9453774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inflationary oscillometric blood pressure monitoring: validation of the OMRON-MIT.
Golara M; Jones C; Randhawa M; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 12488653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of the Omron RX-M, an automated blood pressure measuring device, measuring blood pressure at the wrist, according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
Braam RL; Aslan B; Thien T
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15021075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of drug store blood pressure monitors: an observational study.
Ross KL; Bhasin S; Wilson MP; Stewart SA; Wilson TW
Blood Press Monit; 2013 Dec; 18(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 24192848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Omron HEM-713C automated blood pressure monitor with a standard ausculatory method using a mercury manometer.
Mufunda J; Sparks B; Chifamba J; Dakwa C; Matenga JA; Adams JM; Sparks HV
Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Aug; 42(8):230-2. PubMed ID: 8990566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors, the Del Mar Avionics Pressurometer IV and the Spacelabs 90202.
Santucci S; Cates EM; James GD; Schussel YR; Steiner D; Pickering TG
Am J Hypertens; 1989 Oct; 2(10):797-9. PubMed ID: 2803673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the Omron HEM-705 CP for blood pressure measurement in large epidemiologic studies.
Vera-Cala LM; Orostegui M; Valencia-Angel LI; López N; Bautista LE
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 May; 96(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 21468531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Omron HBP-9031C professional office blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol.
Saito K; Hishiki Y; Takahashi H
J Hum Hypertens; 2020 Oct; 34(10):735-738. PubMed ID: 31969675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Omron HEM-907 before and after hemodialysis.
Czarkowski M; Staszków M; Kostyra K; Shebani Z; Niemczyk S; Matuszkiewicz-Rowińska J
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):232-8. PubMed ID: 19938337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a wrist-type home nocturnal blood pressure monitor in the sitting and supine position according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2:2013 guidelines: Omron HEM-9601T.
Kuwabara M; Harada K; Hishiki Y; Ohkubo T; Kario K; Imai Y
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2020 Jun; 22(6):970-978. PubMed ID: 32447831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards.
Ling J; Ohara Y; Orime Y; Noon GP; Takatani S
J Clin Monit; 1995 Mar; 11(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7760085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
