116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10777223)
1. An evaluation of the National Cervical Screening Programme Otago site.
Coppell K; Paul C; Cox B
N Z Med J; 2000 Feb; 113(1104):48-51. PubMed ID: 10777223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extension of organised cervical cancer screening programmes in Italy and their process indicators.
Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):33-47. PubMed ID: 17824361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer screening in the Faroe Islands.
Hammer T; Lynge E; Djurhuus GW; Joensen JE; Køtlum JE; Hansen SÓ; Sander BB; Mogensen O; Rebolj M
Acta Oncol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 25495570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or invasive cancers in ASCUS women with different management: a population-based cohort study.
Tai YJ; Chen YY; Hsu HC; Chiang CJ; You SL; Chen CA; Cheng WF;
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 29(4):e55. PubMed ID: 29770625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishment of a national cervical screening programme in Ireland, CervicalCheck: the first 6 years.
Flannelly GM; Mooney MT; Greehy GM; Keogh EB; McNally SA; Fitzpatrick PE
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Mar; 27(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 27824660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of abnormal cervical and vaginal cytology among women over age 65 years living with human immunodeficiency virus.
Stewart KA; Allen SM; Chesnokova AE; Syed F; Levison JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):486.e1-486.e10. PubMed ID: 31678094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intensified screening among high risk women within the organised screening programme for cervical cancer in Finland.
Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Anttila A; Nieminen P; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 20560860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical Cancer Screening and Incidence by Age: Unmet Needs Near and After the Stopping Age for Screening.
White MC; Shoemaker ML; Benard VB
Am J Prev Med; 2017 Sep; 53(3):392-395. PubMed ID: 28473240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency of cervical smear abnormalities within 3 years of normal cytology.
Sawaya GF; Kerlikowske K; Lee NC; Gildengorin G; Washington AE
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 96(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 10908766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of screening in reducing invasive cervical cancer registrations in England.
Fouquet R; Gage H
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 8849768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Fitzroy Valley Pap Smear Register. Cervical screening in a population of Australian aboriginal women.
Mak DB; Straton JA
Med J Aust; 1993 Feb; 158(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 8450781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-vaccination type-specific HPV prevalence in confirmed cervical high grade lesions in the Māori and non-Māori populations in New Zealand.
Kang YJ; Lewis H; Smith MA; Simonella L; Neal H; Bromhead C; Canfell K
BMC Infect Dis; 2015 Aug; 15():365. PubMed ID: 26297490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Findings and outcome of teenage women referred for colposcopy at Christchurch Women's Hospital, New Zealand.
Sykes P; Harker D; Peddie D
N Z Med J; 2005 Mar; 118(1211):U1350. PubMed ID: 15778751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in north east Scotland shows fall in incidence and mortality from invasive cancer with concomitant rise in preinvasive disease.
Macgregor JE; Campbell MK; Mann EM; Swanson KY
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1407-11. PubMed ID: 8019250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A closer look at cervical smear uptake and results pre- and post- introduction of the national screening programme.
Gallagher F; Gallagher J
Ir Med J; 2010; 103(7):199-200, 202. PubMed ID: 20845597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monitoring and evaluation of a model demonstration project for the control of cervical cancer in Nakhon Phanom province, Thailand.
Deerasamee S; Srivatanakul P; Sriplung H; Nilvachararung S; Tansuwan U; Pitakpraiwan P; Kaewkungwal J; Singhasivanon P; Nimnakorn P; Sankaranarayanan R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 18260727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
