These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10777400)

  • 1. Biotechnology. Transgenic crops report fuels debate.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2000 Apr; 288(5464):245-7. PubMed ID: 10777400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NAS report under scrutiny.
    Miller HI
    Science; 2000 May; 288(5470):1343. PubMed ID: 10847842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
    Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
    FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
    Reardon S
    Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verdict still out on biotech crops.
    Ervin D
    Science; 2010 May; 328(5982):1105-6. PubMed ID: 20508111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecology. New corn plant draws fire from GM food opponents.
    Ferber D
    Science; 2000 Feb; 287(5457):1390. PubMed ID: 10722381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):295. PubMed ID: 20395485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Bt crops safe?
    Mendelsohn M; Kough J; Vaituzis Z; Matthews K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12949561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 11923822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US National Academies report misses the mark.
    Giddings LV; Miller H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1226-1228. PubMed ID: 27926716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gene-edited plants cross European event horizon.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2018 Sep; 36(9):776. PubMed ID: 30188518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GM crops in the cross hairs.
    Ferber D
    Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5445):1662-6. PubMed ID: 10610557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.
    McHughen A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):725-7. PubMed ID: 17621292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
    Craddock N
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.