These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10778024)

  • 21. Effectiveness of an Electronic Booster Session Delivered to Mandated Students.
    Linowski SA; DiFulvio GT; Fedorchak D; Puleo E
    Int Q Community Health Educ; 2016; 36(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 26857563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feasibility of an email-based electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) to college students in Sweden.
    Bendtsen P; Johansson K; Akerlind I
    Addict Behav; 2006 May; 31(5):777-87. PubMed ID: 15996827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in binge drinking and related problems among American college students between 1993 and 1997. Results of the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study.
    Wechsler H; Dowdall GW; Maenner G; Gledhill-Hoyt J; Lee H
    J Am Coll Health; 1998 Sep; 47(2):57-68. PubMed ID: 9782661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: a randomized factorial study.
    Wood MD; Capone C; Laforge R; Erickson DJ; Brand NH
    Addict Behav; 2007 Nov; 32(11):2509-28. PubMed ID: 17658696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Beyond the "Binge" threshold: heavy drinking patterns and their association with alcohol involvement indices in college students.
    Read JP; Beattie M; Chamberlain R; Merrill JE
    Addict Behav; 2008 Feb; 33(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 17997047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the effectiveness of computer-delivered personalized drinking feedback interventions for college students.
    Jouriles EN; Brown AS; Rosenfield D; McDonald R; Croft K; Leahy MM; Walters ST
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2010 Dec; 24(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 21198222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Misperceptions of peer drinking norms in Canada: another look at the "reign of error" and its consequences among college students.
    Perkins HW
    Addict Behav; 2007 Nov; 32(11):2645-56. PubMed ID: 17719724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The efficacy of a targeted personalized drinking feedback intervention among intercollegiate athletes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Martens MP; Kilmer JR; Beck NC; Zamboanga BL
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2010 Dec; 24(4):660-9. PubMed ID: 20822189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of alcohol use experience and motivational drive on college students' alcohol-related cognition.
    O'Connor RM; Colder CR
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Aug; 33(8):1430-9. PubMed ID: 19426169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increasing Chance-Based Uncertainty Reduces Heavy Drinkers' Cognitive Reactance to Web-Based Personalized Normative Feedback.
    Boyle SC; Earle AM; McCabe N; LaBrie JW
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2018 Jul; 79(4):601-610. PubMed ID: 30079876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students.
    Kypri K; Hallett J; Howat P; McManus A; Maycock B; Bowe S; Horton NJ
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(16):1508-14. PubMed ID: 19752409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. College students define binge drinking and estimate its prevalence: results of a national survey.
    Wechsler H; Kuo M
    J Am Coll Health; 2000 Sep; 49(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 11016129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students.
    Juárez P; Walters ST; Daugherty M; Radi C
    J Drug Educ; 2006; 36(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 17345916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reducing excessive alcohol consumption at university fraternity parties: a cost-effective incentive/reward intervention.
    Glindemann KE; Ehrhart IJ; Drake EA; Geller ES
    Addict Behav; 2007 Jan; 32(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 16650622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Personalized feedback based on a drink-pouring exercise may improve knowledge of, and adherence to, government guidelines for alcohol consumption.
    de Visser RO
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2015 Feb; 39(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 25684051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of a web-based, tailored, alcohol prevention/intervention program for college students: 3-month follow-up.
    Bingham CR; Barretto AI; Walton MA; Bryant CM; Shope JT; Raghunathan TE
    J Drug Educ; 2011; 41(4):405-30. PubMed ID: 22455103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Randomized trials of alcohol-use interventions with college students and their parents: lessons from the Transitions Project.
    Fernandez AC; Wood MD; Laforge R; Black JT
    Clin Trials; 2011 Apr; 8(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 21270141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of a social norm feedback campaign on the drinking norms and behavior of Division I student-athletes.
    Thombs DL; Hamilton MJ
    J Drug Educ; 2002; 32(3):227-44. PubMed ID: 12379053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A campus-community coalition to control alcohol-related problems off campus: an environmental management case study.
    Gebhardt TL; Kaphingst K; DeJong W
    J Am Coll Health; 2000 Mar; 48(5):211-5. PubMed ID: 10778021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prevention for college students who suffer alcohol-induced blackouts could deter high-cost emergency department visits.
    Mundt MP; Zakletskaia LI
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Apr; 31(4):863-70. PubMed ID: 22422503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.