These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10778794)

  • 1. Influence of ankle support on joint range of motion before and after exercise: a meta-analysis.
    Cordova ML; Ingersoll CD; LeBlanc MJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 Apr; 30(4):170-7; discussion 178-82. PubMed ID: 10778794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in ankle range of motion before and after exercise in 2 tape conditions.
    Purcell SB; Schuckman BE; Docherty CL; Schrader J; Poppy W
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):383-9. PubMed ID: 19088055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of kinesio tape compared with nonelastic sports tape and the untaped ankle during a sudden inversion perturbation in male athletes.
    Briem K; Eythörsdöttir H; Magnúsdóttir RG; Pálmarsson R; Rúnarsdöttir T; Sveinsson T
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2011 May; 41(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 21212501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.
    Willeford K; Stanek JM; McLoda TA
    J Athl Train; 2018 Jan; 53(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 29314872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise.
    Greene TA; Hillman SK
    Am J Sports Med; 1990; 18(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 2252091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Passive stability characteristics of ankle braces and tape in simulated barefoot and shoe conditions.
    Eils E; Imberge S; Völker K; Rosenbaum D
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 17092922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Novel Ankle Prophylactic Compared With Lace-Up Brace or Tape.
    Ihmels WD; Seymore KD; Brown TN
    J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Jul; 29(5):693-696. PubMed ID: 31899891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ankle stabilizers affect agility but not vertical jump or dynamic balance performance.
    Ambegaonkar JP; Redmond CJ; Winter C; Cortes N; Ambegaonkar SJ; Thompson B; Guyer SM
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2011 Dec; 4(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 22184741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking.
    Hall EA; Simon JE; Docherty CL
    J Athl Train; 2016 Apr; 51(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 27111586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.
    Metcalfe RC; Schlabach GA; Looney MA; Renehan EJ
    J Athl Train; 1997 Apr; 32(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 16558443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of external ankle support on lower extremity joint mechanics during drop landings.
    Cordova ML; Takahashi Y; Kress GM; Brucker JB; Finch AE
    J Sport Rehabil; 2010 May; 19(2):136-48. PubMed ID: 20543215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of prophylactic ankle supports on pronation during gait.
    Nishikawa T; Kurosaka M; Yoshiya S; Lundin TM; Grabiner MD
    Int Orthop; 2002; 26(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 12466874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match.
    Myburgh KH; Vaughan CL; Isaacs SK
    Am J Sports Med; 1984; 12(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 6507713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prophylactic bracing versus taping for the prevention of ankle sprains in high school athletes: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Mickel TJ; Bottoni CR; Tsuji G; Chang K; Baum L; Tokushige KA
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2006; 45(6):360-5. PubMed ID: 17145460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.
    Martin N; Harter RA
    J Athl Train; 1993; 28(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 16558248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of custom-moulded ankle orthosis with hinged joints and off-the-shelf ankle braces in preventing ankle sprain in lateral cutting movements.
    Lee WC; Kobayashi T; Choy BT; Leung AK
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 22354884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The three-dimensional passive support characteristics of ankle braces.
    Siegler S; Liu W; Sennett B; Nobilini RJ; Dunbar D
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1997 Dec; 26(6):299-309. PubMed ID: 9402566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Leuko and Nessa Ankle braces: effectiveness before and after exercise.
    Tweedy R; Carson T; Vicenzino B
    Aust J Sci Med Sport; 1994; 26(3-4):62-6. PubMed ID: 8665279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of taping and exercise on ankle joint movement in subjects with chronic ankle instability: a preliminary investigation.
    Delahunt E; O'Driscoll J; Moran K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 90(8):1418-22. PubMed ID: 19651278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinematics of ankle taping after a training session.
    Meana M; Alegre LM; Elvira JL; Aguado X
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 Jan; 29(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 17614032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.