BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10779069)

  • 1. Use of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of navicular syndrome in the horse.
    Widmer WR; Buckwalter KA; Fessler JF; Hill MA; VanSickle DC; Ivancevich S
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2000; 41(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 10779069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive contrast magnetic resonance bursography for assessment of the navicular bursa and surrounding soft tissues.
    Maher MC; Werpy NM; Goodrich LR; McIlwraith CW
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21599791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of scintigraphic imaging for injury diagnosis in 264 horses with foot pain.
    Dyson S; Murray R
    Equine Vet J; 2007 Jul; 39(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 17722728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in horses with recent onset navicular syndrome but without radiographic abnormalities.
    Sampson SN; Schneider RK; Gavin PR; Ho CP; Tucker RL; Charles EM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19697596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of radiographic measurements of structures of the equine foot with lesions detected on magnetic resonance imaging.
    de Zani D; Polidori C; di Giancamillo M; Zani DD
    Equine Vet J; 2016 Mar; 48(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 25580879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between radiological and magnetic resonance imaging lesions in the distal border of the navicular bone with particular reference to distal border fragments and osseous cyst-like lesions.
    Biggi M; Dyson S
    Equine Vet J; 2010 Nov; 42(8):707-12. PubMed ID: 21039800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep erosions of the palmar aspect of the navicular bone diagnosed by standing magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sherlock C; Mair T; Blunden T
    Equine Vet J; 2008 Nov; 40(7):684-92. PubMed ID: 19165939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the ultrasonographic characteristics of the podotrochlear apparatus in clinically normal horses and horses with navicular syndrome.
    Grewal JS; McClure SR; Booth LC; Evans RB; Caston SS
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2004 Dec; 225(12):1881-8. PubMed ID: 15643838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of navicular bursa adhesions.
    Holowinski ME; Solano M; Maranda L; García-López JM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 22731965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How does magnetic resonance imaging represent histologic findings in the equine digit?
    Murray RC; Blunden TS; Schramme MC; Dyson SJ
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2006; 47(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 16429981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An optimised injection technique for the navicular bursa that avoids the deep digital flexor tendon.
    Daniel AJ; Goodrich LR; Barrett MF; Werpy NM; Morley PS; McIlwraith CW
    Equine Vet J; 2016 Mar; 48(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 25537027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to injection of the navicular bursa with corticosteroid and hyaluronan following high-field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with signs of navicular syndrome: 101 cases (2000-2008).
    Marsh CA; Schneider RK; Sampson SN; Roberts GD
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Nov; 241(10):1353-64. PubMed ID: 23113529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance and radiographic imaging of a case of bilateral bipartite navicular bones in a horse.
    Harcourt M; Smith C; Bell R; Young A
    Aust Vet J; 2018 Nov; 96(11):464-469. PubMed ID: 30370597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 264 horses with foot pain: the podotrochlear apparatus, deep digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint.
    Dyson S; Murray R
    Equine Vet J; 2007 Jul; 39(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 17722726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot: 15 horses.
    Dyson S; Murray R; Schramme M; Branch M
    Equine Vet J; 2003 Jan; 35(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 12553458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Navicular syndrome in equine patients anatomy, causes, and diagnosis.
    Waguespack R; Hanson RR
    Compend Contin Educ Vet; 2010 Dec; 32(12):E7. PubMed ID: 23705198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomographic evaluation of Finnhorse cadaver forefeet with radiographically problematic findings on the flexor aspect of the navicular bone.
    Ruohoniemi M; Tervahartiala P
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 10519308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of open magnetic resonance imaging for guiding injection of the equine deep digital flexor tendon within the hoof.
    Groom LM; White NA; Adams MN; Barrett JG
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2017 Nov; 58(6):671-678. PubMed ID: 28681515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The diagnosis of lameness associated with distal limb pathology in a horse: a comparison of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Whitton RC; Buckley C; Donovan T; Wales AD; Dennis R
    Vet J; 1998 May; 155(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9638067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons of computed tomography, contrast enhanced computed tomography and standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with lameness localised to the foot. Part 1: anatomic visualisation scores.
    Vallance SA; Bell RJ; Spriet M; Kass PH; Puchalski SM
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Jan; 44(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 21623900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.