These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10780504)

  • 41. The substitutability of cigarettes and food: A behavioral economic comparison in normal weight and overweight or obese smokers.
    Murphy CM; Owens MM; Sweet LH; MacKillop J
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2016 Dec; 30(8):857-867. PubMed ID: 27736143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Self-administration of bretazenil under progressive-ratio schedules: behavioral economic analysis of the role intrinsic efficacy plays in the reinforcing effects of benzodiazepines.
    Licata SC; Rowlett JK
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2011 Jan; 113(2-3):157-64. PubMed ID: 20800977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reinforcer magnitude and demand under fixed-ratio schedules with domestic hens.
    Grant AA; Foster TM; Temple W; Jackson S; Kinloch J; Poling A
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():199-210. PubMed ID: 24393654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of response requirement and the availability of an alternative reinforcer on cigarette smoking by schizophrenics.
    Tidey JW; Higgins ST; Bickel WK; Steingard S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Jul; 145(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 10445372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of Filter Ventilation on Behavioral Economic Demand for Cigarettes: A Preliminary Investigation.
    Stein JS; Koffarnus MN; O'Connor RJ; Hatsukami DK; Bickel WK
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2018 Sep; 20(10):1278-1282. PubMed ID: 29065197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy II: economic complements.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Nov; 88(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 18047226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.
    Choi SE
    Tob Control; 2016 Mar; 25(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 25430738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Methadone and nicotine self-administration in humans: a behavioral economic analysis.
    Spiga R; Martinetti MP; Meisch RA; Cowan K; Hursh S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Mar; 178(2-3):223-31. PubMed ID: 15526094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Breakpoint determination and ethanol self-administration using an across-session progressive ratio procedure in the rat.
    Czachowski CL; Samson HH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1999 Oct; 23(10):1580-6. PubMed ID: 10549988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Behavioral economic analysis of opioid consumption in heroin-dependent individuals: effects of alternative reinforcer magnitude and post-session drug supply.
    Greenwald MK; Steinmiller CL
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2009 Sep; 104(1-2):84-93. PubMed ID: 19464125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of varying the "openness" of an economy on responding for cigarettes.
    Mitchell SH; de Wit H; Zacny JP
    Behav Pharmacol; 1994 Apr; 5(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 11224264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Increasing the Value of an Alternative Monetary Reinforcer Reduces Cigarette Choice in Adolescents.
    Cassidy RN; Tidey JW; Kahler CW; Wray TB; Colby SM
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1449-55. PubMed ID: 25666814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using the Multiple-Choice Procedure to Measure the Relative Reinforcing Efficacy of Gambling: Initial Validity Evidence Among College Students.
    Butler LH; Irons JG; Bassett DT; Correia CJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2018 Jun; 34(2):513-520. PubMed ID: 28932934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.
    Call NA; Trosclair-Lasserre NM; Findley AJ; Reavis AR; Shillingsburg MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):763-77. PubMed ID: 23322931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Binary components of food reinforcement: Amplitude and persistence.
    Epstein LH; Stein JS; Paluch RA; MacKillop J; Bickel WK
    Appetite; 2018 Jan; 120():67-74. PubMed ID: 28847564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Concurrent progressive ratio schedules: Effects of reinforcer probability on breakpoint and response allocation.
    Jarmolowicz DP; Sofis MJ; Darden AC
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():103-7. PubMed ID: 27131782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A steady-state test of the demand curve analysis of relative reinforcer efficacy.
    Madden GJ; Hartman EC
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Feb; 14(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 16503707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. II. A unit-price analysis of cigarette smoking.
    Bickel WK; DeGrandpre RJ; Hughes JR; Higgins ST
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 2037824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.