186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10781388)
1. Comparison of four sequential methods allowing for early stopping of comparative clinical trials.
Sebille V; Bellissant E
Clin Sci (Lond); 2000 May; 98(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 10781388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a mis-specification of the response rate under standard treatment in sequential clinical trials.
Sébille V; Bellissant E
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 19(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 16176336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequential boundaries approach in clinical trials with unequal allocation ratios.
Jafari P; Ayatollahi SM; Behboodian J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 16412232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Symmetric group sequential test designs.
Emerson SS; Fleming TR
Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):905-23. PubMed ID: 2675998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early stopping rules in clinical trials based on sequential monitoring of serious adverse events.
Kramar A; Bascoul-Mollevi C
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 19073996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An algorithm for the design of group sequential triangular tests for single-arm clinical trials with a binary endpoint.
McWilliams TP
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2794-801. PubMed ID: 20860065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential clinical trials for normal variates using interval composite hypotheses.
Lachin JM
Biometrics; 1981 Mar; 37(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 7248445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A decision rule for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a primary and supportive outcome.
Zhao Y; Grambsch PM; Neaton JD
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 17456513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mid-course sample size modification in clinical trials based on the observed treatment effect.
Jennison C; Turnbull BW
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):971-93. PubMed ID: 12627413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Design and analysis of phase II trials in oncology with a group sequential method, the triangular test].
Bellissant E; Bénichou J; Chastang C
Therapie; 1991; 46(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 2020920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuous and group sequential conditional probability ratio tests for phase II clinical trials.
Tan M; Xiong X
Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(19):2037-51. PubMed ID: 8896138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian sample size determination in non-sequential clinical trials: Statistical aspects and some regulatory considerations.
Grouin JM; Coste M; Bunouf P; Lecoutre B
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4914-24. PubMed ID: 17559054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection.
Stallard N; Todd S
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):689-703. PubMed ID: 12587100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the two-sided single triangular test to the double triangular test.
Sébille V; Bellissant E
Control Clin Trials; 2001 Oct; 22(5):503-14. PubMed ID: 11578784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [How to assess the size of a clinical trial?].
Paesmans M
Rev Mal Respir; 1994; 11(6):547-57. PubMed ID: 7831504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
Morgan CC
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing type I & type II error spending for two-sided group sequential designs.
Rudser KD; Emerson SS
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17933592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
Laster LL; Johnson MF
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
