BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10781970)

  • 1. Contraceptive devices and the medical devices directive.
    Austin A
    Br J Fam Plann; 2000 Jan; 26(1):56. PubMed ID: 10781970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'CE-Marking' on contraceptive devices: what does it mean?
    Bounds W
    Br J Fam Plann; 2000 Jan; 26(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 10781969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amendments to the medical device directive.
    Cutler IR
    Med Device Technol; 1996; 7(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10172723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CE marking & the MDD: what difference will the new regulations make?
    Lindley E
    EDTNA ERCA J; 1996; 22(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 10723308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical device management.
    Young S
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1999 May; 6(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 10478078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CE marking--what does it really mean?
    Bentley D
    J Tissue Viability; 1999 Jan; 9(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10480978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical devices: new regulations, new responsibilities.
    De Giovanni JV
    Br Heart J; 1995 May; 73(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 7786646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CE mark. What's that?
    Wren D
    Br J Theatre Nurs; 1998 Dec; 8(9):24. PubMed ID: 10076235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neither protective nor harmonized: the crossborder regulation of medical devices in the EU.
    Jarman H; Rozenblum S; Huang TJ
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2021 Jan; 16(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 32631465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sterile by any other name.
    Donawa ME
    Med Device Technol; 1996; 7(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10172722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Narrow-and-sharp or broad-and-blunt--regulations of hazardous chemicals in consumer products in the European Union.
    Molander L; Rudén C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Apr; 62(3):523-31. PubMed ID: 22107914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How medical devices are regulated in the UK.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2010 Jul; 48(7):82-4. PubMed ID: 20631197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Safe Medical Devices Act.
    Clemens AM; Woo P
    Natl Med Leg J; 1993; 4(3):1, 7. PubMed ID: 8343564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Switzerland: one year's experience with new regulations and a new agency.
    Voelksen R
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Mar; 14(2):28-9. PubMed ID: 12698697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk analysis: a standard approach? (Part I).
    Donawa ME
    Med Device Technol; 1995 Apr; 6(3):11-4. PubMed ID: 10172443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The safety of medical devices and the role of the FDA.
    Pillar B
    Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(4):284-6. PubMed ID: 1922433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Safe Medical Devices Act: what it means in practice.
    DiMotto J
    Nurs Qual Connect; 1993; 3(3):1, 5. PubMed ID: 8274957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congress seeks to ensure safe medical devices.
    Collins M
    Trustee; 1990 Jan; 43(1):3. PubMed ID: 10103486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety standards and the Medical Devices Regulations 1994.
    Robertson C
    Health Estate J; 1995 May; 49(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 10172364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990.
    Samuel FE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1991; 10(1):192-5. PubMed ID: 2045049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.