These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10783453)

  • 1. Mechanical and biomechanical measurements of five currently available osteosynthesis systems of self-tapping screws.
    Saka B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 38(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 10783453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of pilot hole size on the insertion torque and pullout strength of self-tapping cortical bone screws in osteoporotic bone.
    Battula S; Schoenfeld AJ; Sahai V; Vrabec GA; Tank J; Njus GO
    J Trauma; 2008 Apr; 64(4):990-5. PubMed ID: 18404066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
    Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixation properties of a biodegradable "free-form" osteosynthesis plate with screws with cut-off screw heads: biomechanical evaluation over 26 weeks.
    Väänänen P; Nurmi JT; Lappalainen R; Jank S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 19121956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.
    Haug RH; Fattahi TT; Goltz M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 59(10):1199-210. PubMed ID: 11573182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles.
    Uckan S; Schwimmer A; Kummer F; Greenberg AM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11437421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination of microplate and miniplate for osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures: an experimental study.
    Feller KU; Richter G; Schneider M; Eckelt U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 31(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11936405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs.
    Huja SS; Litsky AS; Beck FM; Johnson KA; Larsen PE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 15775945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct.
    DiPaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 17607102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.
    Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
    Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Substitutes for human cadaveric bone in maxillofacial rigid fixation research.
    Bredbenner TL; Haug RH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Nov; 90(5):574-80. PubMed ID: 11077379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Morarend C; Qian F; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Grosland NM; Morgan TA; McManus M; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 19651352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional Synthes mandibular plates: A laboratory model.
    Chiodo TA; Ziccardi VB; Janal M; Sabitini C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1475-9. PubMed ID: 16982304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.