163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10783852)
1. The relationship between spinal and appendicular bone mass modified by physical, historical, and lifestyle factors.
Ishikawa K; Ohta T; Tahara Y; Suzuki T
J Bone Miner Metab; 2000; 18(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 10783852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?
Ito M; Nishida A; Kono J; Kono M; Uetani M; Hayashi K
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):959-64. PubMed ID: 12955312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurements in calcaneus with DXA and SXA at other skeletal sites: a population-based study on 280 children aged 11-16 years.
Sundberg M; Gärdsell P; Johnell O; Ornstein E; Sernbo I
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 9850347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in assessment and follow-up of skeletal status in patients after kidney transplantation.
Kovac D; Lindic J; Kandus A; Bren FA
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Apr; 14(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 12730786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Bone density measurement: quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and distal radius. A comparison with dual spectrum X-ray absorptiometry].
Boyanov M; Shinkov A; Nestorova R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 Apr; 132(16):869-73. PubMed ID: 17443442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Lowet G; Brys P; Aerssens J; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound.
Ross P; Huang C; Davis J; Imose K; Yates J; Vogel J; Wasnich R
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 7786635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative ultrasound measurements of the tibia and calcaneus in comparison with DXA measurements at various skeletal sites.
Tromp AM; Smit JH; Deeg DJ; Lips P
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 10450412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.
Langton CM; Langton DK
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [X-ray densitometry and ultrasonography of the heel bone--sensitivity and comparison with densitometry of the axial skeleton].
Michalská D; Zikán V; Stĕpán J; Weichetová M; Kubová V; Krenková J; Masatová A
Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Apr; 139(8):231-6. PubMed ID: 10916211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancy in bone mineral densities at different skeletal sites in hip osteoarthritis patients.
Okano K; Ito M; Aoyagi K; Osaki M; Enomoto H; Yamaguchi K
Mod Rheumatol; 2014 Mar; 24(2):340-2. PubMed ID: 24593210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of vertebral failure loads from spinal and femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and calcaneal ultrasound: an in situ analysis with intact soft tissues.
Lochmüller EM; Eckstein F; Kaiser D; Zeller JB; Landgraf J; Putz R; Steldinger R
Bone; 1998 Nov; 23(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 9823447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients.
Li C; Sun J; Yu L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jan; 101(2):e28325. PubMed ID: 35029176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative bone ultrasound at phalanges and calcaneus in osteoporotic postmenopausal women: influence of age and measurement site.
Camozzi V; De Terlizzi F; Zangari M; Luisetto G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1039-45. PubMed ID: 17445968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between spinal and radial bone mineral density in children measured by X-ray absorptiometry.
Moreira-Andrés MN; Cañizo FJ; Papapietro K; Rejas J; Hawkins FG
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 1995; 8(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 7584695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unique and common genetic effects between bone mineral density and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures: the Fels Longitudinal Study.
Lee M; Czerwinski SA; Choh AC; Demerath EW; Sun SS; Chumlea WC; Towne B; Siervogel RM
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 16541205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between paediatric calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and DXA with laser (DXL) as well as body composition.
Sioen I; Goemare S; Ahrens W; De Henauw S; De Vriendt T; Kaufman JM; Ottevaere C; Roggen I; Swolin-Eide D; Tubić B; Vyncke K; Mårild S;
Int J Obes (Lond); 2011 Apr; 35 Suppl 1():S125-30. PubMed ID: 21483412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
