These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10783924)

  • 1. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss.
    Souza PE; Bishop RD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 10783924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
    Souza PE; Bishop RD
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss.
    McCreery RW; Alexander J; Brennan MA; Hoover B; Kopun J; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):440-7. PubMed ID: 24535558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hogan CA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):432-41. PubMed ID: 9670535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using multichannel wide-dynamic range compression in severely hearing-impaired listeners: effects on speech recognition and quality.
    Souza PE; Jenstad LM; Folino R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 15809540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the long-term SNRs of static and adaptive compression amplification techniques for speech in noise.
    Lai YH; Li PC; Tsai KS; Chu WC; Young ST
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):671-83. PubMed ID: 24131603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Cummings KJ
    Am J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 8(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 10499119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.
    Ching TY; Dillon H; Katsch R; Byrne D
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 11409857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Hurtig RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):877-86. PubMed ID: 10462793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels.
    Souza P; Wright R; Bor S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):474-86. PubMed ID: 22207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.
    Hornsby BW; Johnson EE; Picou E
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):543-55. PubMed ID: 21336138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.