These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10783924)

  • 21. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations.
    John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.
    Johnson EE
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):143-70. PubMed ID: 24253361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.
    Turner CW; Henry BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 12398472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting directional hearing aid benefit for individual listeners.
    Ricketts T; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000; 11(10):561-9; quiz 575. PubMed ID: 11198073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of preferred volume setting on speech audibility in different hearing aid circuits.
    Souza PE; Kitch VJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Sep; 12(8):415-22. PubMed ID: 11599876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):592-604. PubMed ID: 25313549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.
    Simpson A; Hersbach AA; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):619-29. PubMed ID: 17118905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Patient-Centered, Provider-Facilitated Approach to the Refinement of Nonlinear Frequency Compression Parameters Based on Subjective Preference Ratings of Amplified Sound Quality.
    Johnson EE; Light KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):689-702. PubMed ID: 26333877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of reducing low-frequency amplification on consonant perception in quiet and noise.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 6521454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consonant perception with linear and compression amplification.
    Hickson L; Dodd B; Byrne D
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 8552977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Chi SL; Flock S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 10450899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS; Rice T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1174-84. PubMed ID: 11063239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.