1597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10784622)
1. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.
Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM
J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No polarization of type 1 or type 2 precursor dendritic cells in peripheral blood stem cell collections of non-hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, GM-CSF, or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF.
Gazitt Y; Akay C; Thomas C
Stem Cells Dev; 2006 Apr; 15(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 16646673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a randomized prospective study.
Gazitt Y; Callander N; Freytes CO; Shaughnessy P; Liu Q; Tsai TW; Devore P
J Hematother Stem Cell Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):737-48. PubMed ID: 11091498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide and colony-stimulating factors is more cost-effective than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors alone in mobilizing peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells.
Meisenberg B; Brehm T; Schmeckel A; Miller W; McMillan R
Transfusion; 1998 Feb; 38(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 9531956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
Demirer T; Buckner CD; Gooley T; Appelbaum FR; Rowley S; Chauncey T; Lilleby K; Storb R; Bensinger WI
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jun; 17(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 8807097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF.
Ballestrero A; Ferrando F; Garuti A; Basta P; Gonella R; Stura P; Mela GS; Sessarego M; Gobbi M; Patrone F
J Clin Oncol; 1999 Apr; 17(4):1296. PubMed ID: 10561192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors from normal donors using the combination of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor results in fewer plasmacytoid dendritic cells in the graft and enhanced donor T cell engraftment with Th1 polarization: results from a randomized clinical trial.
Lonial S; Akhtari M; Kaufman J; Torre C; Lechowicz MJ; Flowers C; Sinha R; Khoury HJ; Langston AA; Waller EK
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2013 Mar; 19(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 23201472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and neoplastic cell contamination in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone for mobilization.
Bertolini F; Lanza A; Peccatori F; Zibera C; Gibelli N; Perotti C; Da Prada GA; Torretta L; Cocorocchio E; Martinelli G; Robustelli della Cuna G
Ann Oncol; 1998 Aug; 9(8):913-6. PubMed ID: 9789616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CD34+ cells mobilized by cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are functionally different from CD34+ cells mobilized by G-CSF.
Cesana C; Carlo-Stella C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Sammarelli G; Caramatti C; Tabilio A; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Mar; 21(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 9543059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.
Hohaus S; Martin H; Wassmann B; Egerer G; Haus U; Färber L; Burger KJ; Goldschmidt H; Hoelzer D; Haas R
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Oct; 22(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 9818688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, sequential granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, and scheduled commencement of leukapheresis in 225 patients undergoing autologous transplantation.
Bashey A; Donohue M; Liu L; Medina B; Corringham S; Ihasz A; Carrier E; Castro JE; Holman PR; Xu R; Law P; Ball ED; Lane TA
Transfusion; 2007 Nov; 47(11):2153-60. PubMed ID: 17958545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients.
Watts MJ; Ings SJ; Leverett D; MacMillan A; Devereux S; Goldstone AH; Linch DC
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 10646877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial comparing the combination of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of dendritic cell subsets in hematopoietic progenitor cell products.
Lonial S; Hicks M; Rosenthal H; Langston A; Redei I; Torre C; Duenzl M; Feinstein B; Cherry J; Waller EK
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Dec; 10(12):848-57. PubMed ID: 15570253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobilization of blood-derived stem and progenitor cells in normal subjects by granulocyte-macrophage- and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors.
Lane TA; Ho AD; Bashey A; Peterson S; Young D; Law P
Transfusion; 1999 Jan; 39(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 9920165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Bellido M; Sureda A; Martino R; Madoz P; García J; Brunet S
Haematologica; 1998 May; 83(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9658727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
