These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10785297)
1. Enamel demineralisation assessed by computerised image analysis of clinical photographs. Benson PE; Pender N; Higham SM J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 10785297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of quantitative measurement of white enamel demineralisation by image analysis. Willmot DR; Benson PE; Pender N; Brook AH Caries Res; 2000; 34(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 10773636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphometric assessment of enamel demineralisation from photographs. Benson PE; Pender N; Higham SM; Edgar WM J Dent; 1998 Nov; 26(8):669-77. PubMed ID: 9793289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying enamel demineralization from teeth with orthodontic brackets--a comparison of two methods. Part 1: repeatability and agreement. Benson PE; Pender N; Higham SM Eur J Orthod; 2003 Apr; 25(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 12737213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mineral density of hypomineralised enamel. Farah RA; Swain MV; Drummond BK; Cook R; Atieh M J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 19737596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of white lesions surrounding orthodontic brackets: captured slides vs digital camera images. Benson PE; Shah AA; Willmot DR Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 15825787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demineralization properties of newly erupted and mature premolars around orthodontic brackets: an in-vivo study. Uysal T; Amasyali M; Ozcan S; Sagdic D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):582.e1-6; discussion 582-3. PubMed ID: 20451770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring de- and remineralisation of enamel in vitro using an infrared reflectance meter. Anderson P; Davis GR; Ahluwalia MH Caries Res; 1996; 30(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 8946106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polarized versus nonpolarized digital images for the measurement of demineralization surrounding orthodontic brackets. Benson PE; Ali Shah A; Robert Willmot D Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 18251618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values. Fleming GJ; Hall DP; Shortall AC; Burke FJ J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15683895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying enamel demineralization from teeth with orthodontic brackets--a comparison of two methods. Part 2: validity. Benson PE; Pender N; Higham SM Eur J Orthod; 2003 Apr; 25(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 12737214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological, morphological, profilometric and optical changes of human tooth enamel after microabrasion. Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN; Schug J; Lutz F Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():4A-8A. PubMed ID: 14674490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative light-induced fluorescence method. Tranaeus S; Shi XQ; Lindgren LE; Trollsås K; Angmar-Månsson B Caries Res; 2002; 36(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 11961323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between laser fluorescence and enamel hypomineralisation. Farah RA; Drummond BK; Swain MV; Williams S J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):915-21. PubMed ID: 18786755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Degree of mineral loss in softened human enamel after acid erosion measured by chemical analysis. Eisenburger M J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 19278768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based composites with and without an intermediary flowable layer. Cara RR; Fleming GJ; Palin WM; Walmsley AD; Burke FJ J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):482-9. PubMed ID: 17321029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The erosive susceptibility of cervical versus occlusal enamel. Hammadeh M; Rees JS Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001 Mar; 9(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11695129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of restoration volume on stresses in a mandibular molar: a finite element study. Wayne JS; Chande R; Porter HC; Janus C J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 24726589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evaluation of resin infiltration for masking labial enamel white spot lesions. Kim S; Kim EY; Jeong TS; Kim JW Int J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jul; 21(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 21401750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]