BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1055 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10785304)

  • 1. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
    Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Tan S; Teh TY
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 10672147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Tan WS; Yeo JC; Yap WY; Ong SB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12120776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Yeo EJ; Yap WY; Ong DS; Tan JW
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 12540118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Rocha RA; Palma-Dibb RG
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations.
    Raskin A; Eschrich G; Dejou J; About I
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec; 14(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 22724110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
    Loguercio AD; Alessandra R; Mazzocco KC; Dias AL; Busato AL; Singer Jda M; Rosa P
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does pretreatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glass-ionomer cements?
    Arweiler NB; Auschill TM; Reich E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.