These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10786149)

  • 1. Setting shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of resin-modified glass-ionomer in experimental cylindrical cavities.
    Kim YG; Hirano S
    Dent Mater J; 1999 Mar; 18(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 10786149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 10823073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Sidhu SK; Sherriff M; Watson TF
    J Dent Res; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1495-501. PubMed ID: 9240386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical properties of resin-modified glass-ionomers.
    Kim Y; Hirano S; Hirasawa T
    Dent Mater J; 1998 Mar; 17(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 9663064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does pretreatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glass-ionomer cements?
    Arweiler NB; Auschill TM; Reich E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal sealability of resin-modified glass ionomers for base/liner: effect of hygroscopic expansion and bond strength.
    Irie M; Nakai H
    Dent Mater J; 1996 Dec; 15(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 9550017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may affect the integrity of tooth structure in the open sandwich technique.
    Czarnecka B; Kruszelnicki A; Kao A; Strykowska M; Nicholson JW
    Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e301-5. PubMed ID: 24950810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexure strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites.
    Li J; Liu Y; Liu Y; Söremark R; Sundström F
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1996 Feb; 54(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8669242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Coutinho E; Cardoso MV; De Munck J; Neves AA; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Peumans M; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1347-57. PubMed ID: 19595446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Lee MS; Tu LS; DeLong R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 20970176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.