These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10786518)

  • 1. Book reviews--keeping up to date in the era of the information super highway.
    Millar B
    J Clin Nurs; 1999 Sep; 8(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 10786518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revising a book chapter written by a previous author.
    Tamburri LM; Hix CD; Sole ML
    Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):7-9. PubMed ID: 12092431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning to review.
    Freedman R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical textbooks: an academic hazard?
    Noble MA; Steinmeyer P
    Nurs Health Care; 1991 Oct; 12(8):402-3. PubMed ID: 1922977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Writing for publication.
    Frisch N
    Nurs Diagn; 1996; 7(3):95-6. PubMed ID: 8868792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Writing a feature article: not all articles are alike.
    Pelletier LR
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 14562512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Checklist for the evaluation of research articles.
    DuRant RH
    J Adolesc Health; 1994 Jan; 15(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8204635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to revise an article.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 15068572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
    Fisher RS; Powers LE
    Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Online submission of manuscripts for "The Orthopedist."].
    Orthopade; 2012 Oct; 41(10):799. PubMed ID: 23052845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission.
    Bourne PE; Polka JK; Vale RD; Kiley R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 May; 13(5):e1005473. PubMed ID: 28472041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript.
    Valente S
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16189960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talking back to reviewers: the gentle art of resubmission.
    O'Connell KA
    J Prof Nurs; 2001; 17(6):276. PubMed ID: 11712110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reviewing process.
    Baltzopoulos V
    J Sports Sci; 2004 Feb; 22(2):147-8. PubMed ID: 14998092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is in store for 2004? Rapid review will mean cutting edge information to you!
    Kelley LS
    J Gerontol Nurs; 2003 Dec; 29(12):5. PubMed ID: 14692237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biased book review.
    Schwartz HJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 1997 Jun; 154(6):888. PubMed ID: 9167534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.