212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10787201)
1. Accuracy of CO2 angiography in vessel diameter assessment: a comparative study of CO2 versus iodinated contrast material in an aortoiliac flow model.
Moresco KP; Patel N; Johnson MS; Trobridge D; Bergan KA; Lalka SG
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 10787201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of CO(2) angiography in vessel diameter assessment: a comparative study of CO(2) versus iodinated contrast material in a porcine model.
McLennan G; Moresco KP; Patel NH; Trobridge A; Dreesen J; Tennery J; Seshadri R; Johnson CS
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):985-9. PubMed ID: 11487680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities: carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material.
Oliva VL; Denbow N; Thérasse E; Common AA; Harel C; Giroux MF; Soulez G
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jun; 10(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 10392939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower limb angiography: a prospective study comparing carbon dioxide with iodinated contrast material in 30 patients.
Rolland Y; Duvauferrier R; Lucas A; Gourlay C; Morcet N; Rambeau M; Chaperon J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 9694446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidetector CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for aortoiliac length measurements prior to endovascular AAA repair.
Diehm N; Herrmann P; Dinkel HP
J Endovasc Ther; 2004 Oct; 11(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 15482025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1996 AUR Memorial Award. Densitometric analysis of eccentric vascular stenoses: comparison of CO2 and iodinated contrast media.
Black CM; Lang EV; Kusnick CA; Siebes M; Barnhart W; Berbaum KS; Hoffman EA
Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):985-93. PubMed ID: 9017012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CO2 microbubble contrast enhancement in x-ray angiography.
Kariya S; Komemushi A; Nakatani M; Yoshida R; Sawada S; Tanigawa N
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 22981730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries with the blood pool agent Vasovist: initial results in comparison to intra-arterial DSA].
Vogt FM; Herborn CU; Parsons EC; Kröger K; Barkhausen J; Goyen M
Rofo; 2007 Apr; 179(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 17385136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Vessel Measurements in Infra-Popliteal Endovascular Interventions: The Below-the-Knee Calibration Study.
Kuku KO; Garcia-Garcia HM; Finizio M; Melaku GD; Wilson VA; Beyene SS; Kahsay Y; Jones-McMeans JM; Rapoza RJ; Parikh SA; DeRubertis BG; Varcoe RL; Adams GL
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():35-41. PubMed ID: 34544659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0 T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
Mohrs OK; Oberholzer K; Krummenauer F; Bernhard S; Kalden P; Neufang A; Thelen M; Kreitner KF
Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):985-91. PubMed ID: 15237341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of gadodiamide compared with dilute iodinated contrast material for imaging of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries.
Spinosa DJ; Angle JF; Hagspiel KD; Bissonette E; Conaway MR; Hartwell GD; Matsumoto AH
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2000 Jun; 11(6):733-7. PubMed ID: 10877418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balloon-Occluded Carbon Dioxide Gas Angiography for Internal Iliac Arteriography and Intervention.
Kishino M; Nakaminato S; Kitazume Y; Miyasaka N; Kudo T; Saida Y; Tateishi U
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Jul; 41(7):1106-1111. PubMed ID: 29666905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gadolinium, carbon dioxide, and iodinated contrast material for planning inferior vena cava filter placement: a prospective trial.
Brown DB; Pappas JA; Vedantham S; Pilgram TK; Olsen RV; Duncan JR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Aug; 14(8):1017-22. PubMed ID: 12902559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and safety of carbon dioxide inferior vena cavography.
Boyd-Kranis R; Sullivan KL; Eschelman DJ; Bonn J; Gardiner GA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):1183-9. PubMed ID: 10527195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT angiography in stent-graft sizing: impact of using inner vs. outer wall measurements of aortic neck diameters.
Iezzi R; Dattesi R; Pirro F; Nestola M; Santoro M; Snider F; Bonomo L
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 21679062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravenous intravascular ultrasound for arterial visualization: a feasibility study.
Kriegel AV; Salles-Cunha S; Pigott JP; Beebe HG
J Endovasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 3(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 8959502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound- and centerline computed tomography-determined aortic diameters during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
Han SM; Elsayed RS; Ham SW; Mahajan A; Fleischman F; Rowe VL; Cunningham MJ; Weaver FA
J Vasc Surg; 2017 Oct; 66(4):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 28648482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study.
Kalva SP; Sahani DV; Hahn PF; Saini S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 16778612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease.
Pliagas G; Saab F; Stavroulakis K; Bisdas T; Finton S; Heaney C; McGoff T; Hardy K; Adams G; Mustapha JA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 32(3):99-103. PubMed ID: 32123141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
