141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10787343)
1. US geneticists encouraged to play by the book.
Wadman M
Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6778):530. PubMed ID: 10787343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinton backs Congressional efforts on genetic discrimination.
Lehrman S
Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6639):216. PubMed ID: 9230420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Geneticists oppose consent ruling.
Wadman M
Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6774):114-5. PubMed ID: 10724137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy in genetics research.
Fuller BP; Kahn MJ; Barr PA; Biesecker L; Crowley E; Garber J; Mansoura MK; Murphy P; Murray J; Phillips J; Rothenberg K; Rothstein M; Stopfer J; Swergold G; Weber B; Collins FK; Hudson KL
Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5432):1359-61. PubMed ID: 10490410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in genetic research: disclosure and informed consent.
Reilly PR; Boshar MF; Holtzman SH
Nat Genet; 1997 Jan; 15(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 8988163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dangerous intersections.
Korn D
Issues Sci Technol; 1996; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11654761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards, genetic research, and privacy.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):6. PubMed ID: 11660229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of the Genetic Privacy Act on medicine.
Reilly PR
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 8715060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Possible protection for researchers who maintain genetic data records.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Apr; 11(4):6. PubMed ID: 11660233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forget Washington: state laws threaten to restrict genetic research, too.
Fox JL
J NIH Res; 1997 Nov; 9(11):19-20. PubMed ID: 11656800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Archive available for genetic studies.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5342):1389. PubMed ID: 11644980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Japan set to tighten ethics rules for genetic sampling.
Triendl R
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6772):819-20. PubMed ID: 10706252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is genetics research "minimal risk".
Merz JF
IRB; 1996; 18(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11654745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Israel split on rights to genetic privacy.
Watzman H
Nature; 1998 Jul; 394(6690):214. PubMed ID: 9685149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. House backs curb on genetic information.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6573):374. PubMed ID: 8602229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. China brings in regulations to put a stop to 'genetic piracy'.
Dickson D
Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6697):5. PubMed ID: 9738485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
Stepanuk NA
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinton backs broad genetic safeguards.
Marshall E
Science; 1997 Jul; 277(5324):308-9. PubMed ID: 9518356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Certificates of confidentiality: a valuable tool for protecting genetic data.
Earley CL; Strong LC
Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Sep; 57(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 7668302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Legislating privacy: the HIV experience.
Parmet WE
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 8715058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
