These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10787776)

  • 1. County commissioners as a key constituency for public health.
    Lind P; Finley D
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2000 Mar; 6(2):30-8. PubMed ID: 10787776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interjurisdictional collaboration: local public health officials versus county commissioners.
    Felton J; Golbeck AL
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2011; 17(1):E14-21. PubMed ID: 21135650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating with local elected officials: lessons learned from clean indoor air ordinance campaigns.
    O'Dougherty M; Forster J; Widome R
    Health Promot Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 19011117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public health as a county government priority: problems and solutions for the political arena.
    Marando VL; Melchior AC
    Am J Prev Med; 1995; 11(6 Suppl):17-23. PubMed ID: 8776137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obstacles and opportunities to using research evidence in local public health decision-making in England.
    Kneale D; Rojas-García A; Thomas J
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Jun; 17(1):61. PubMed ID: 31248422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario.
    Abelson J; Lomas J; Eyles J; Birch S; Veenstra G
    CMAJ; 1995 Aug; 153(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 7634217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model approach for developing effective local public health policies: a North Carolina County responds to large-scale hog production.
    Upshaw VM; Okun MF
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2002 Sep; 8(5):44-54. PubMed ID: 15156647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Widening the debate? Consultation and participation in local health care planning in the English and Swedish health services.
    North N; Werkö S
    Int J Health Serv; 2002; 32(4):781-98. PubMed ID: 12456125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Croatian model of polycentric health planning and decision making.
    Sogorić S; Dzakula A; Rukavina TV; Grozić-Zivolić S; Lazarić-Zec D; Dzono-Boban A; Brborović O; Lang S; Vuletić S
    Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 18678435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.
    Gooberman-Hill R; Horwood J; Calnan M
    Health Expect; 2008 Sep; 11(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 18816323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participatory Budgeting: Could It Diminish Health Disparities in the United States?
    Hagelskamp C; Schleifer D; Rinehart C; Silliman R
    J Urban Health; 2018 Oct; 95(5):766-771. PubMed ID: 29736813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Swedish public health policy: Impact on regional and local public health practice and priorities.
    Makenzius M; Wamala S
    J Public Health Policy; 2015 Aug; 36(3):335-49. PubMed ID: 25789926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Political strategy 101: how to make health policy and influence political people.
    Mebane F; Blendon RJ
    J Child Neurol; 2001 Jul; 16(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 11453449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The rationing debate. Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions. The case for.
    Lenaghan J
    BMJ; 1997 Mar; 314(7085):967-70. PubMed ID: 9099126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Priority setting in Swedish health care: are the politicians ready?
    Rosén P; De Fine Licht J; Ohlsson H
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 May; 42(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 24516064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resource allocation within the National AIDS Control Program of Pakistan: a qualitative assessment of decision maker's opinions.
    Husain S; Kadir M; Fatmi Z
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():11. PubMed ID: 17244371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The HSJ interview: Dr Evan Harris. Gruel intentions. Interview by Lyn Whitfield.
    Harris E
    Health Serv J; 2003 May; 113(5856):20-2. PubMed ID: 12789750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Municipal officials' perceived barriers to consideration of physical activity in community design decision making.
    Goins KV; Schneider KL; Brownson R; Carnoske C; Evenson KR; Eyler A; Heinrich K; Litt J; Lyn R; Maddock J; Reed H; Tompkins NO; Lemon SC
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2013; 19(3 Suppl 1):S65-73. PubMed ID: 23529058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the authority of local public health directors in the context of organizational structure: an exploratory, multimodal approach.
    Miner Gearin KJ; Thrash AM; Frauendienst R; Myhre J; Gyllstrom ME; Riley WJ; Schroeder J
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2012 Nov; 18(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 23023279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
    Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.