327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10788190)
1. Important lessons to learn.
Randall D
Rehab Manag; 1999; 12(6):44-6. PubMed ID: 10788190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Subacute strategies. The sword of Damocles. How the new transfer policy will transform subacute care.
Griffin K
Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 Nov; 20(11):37-8. PubMed ID: 10174577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why subacute still makes financial sense.
Griffin KM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 May; 21(5):39-40. PubMed ID: 10185944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Skilled nursing facilities reform.
Balance; 1998 Jun; 2(4):24-6. PubMed ID: 10182011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in the nursing facility-hospital interface after the prospective payment system: the effects on patients with infections in the post-acute care setting.
Phillips VL; Langmuir H; Parmelee P; Weinberg AD
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2003; 4(3 Suppl):S105-9. PubMed ID: 12854982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HCFA finalizing prospective payment, consolidated billing implementation guidance.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Apr; 6(7):2-3. PubMed ID: 10178446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Industry groups praise HCFA's decision not to implement proposed PPS refinements; current system to remain in place for another year.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Aug; 8(16):1-6. PubMed ID: 11186761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. MDS (minimum data set) completion, locking and transmission requirements.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Aug; 6(17):6-7. PubMed ID: 10182873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How the coming Medicare therapy reimbursement changes will effect subacute providers.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Sep; 5(18):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 10173880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of the rehabilitation prospective payment system on case management.
Matarelli SA
Case Manager; 2001; 12(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 11244403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reviewing admissions policies under PPS.
Miles F; Tisdall NP
Provider; 1999 Mar; 25(3):suppl 4, 16. PubMed ID: 10350884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Putting patient care first. An information systems strategy for PPS compliance.
Cerchiara KM; Stoddard N; Bloom C
Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):51-2. PubMed ID: 10351621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare revisions open opportunities. New cost reporting forms enhance prospective payment.
Salazar VR
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Feb; 16(2):37-8, 82. PubMed ID: 10124122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk-sharing, more ancillary service management critical for continued survival under PPS.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jun; 7(13):5-7. PubMed ID: 10538844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Trade groups ask for delay in implementation of PPS refinements.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Jun; 8(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11183219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New provider reimbursement manual offers clarifications on PPS but also raises new questions.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Aug; 6(16):1-2. PubMed ID: 10182229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HCFA again delays 20 percent add-on; providers to receive retroactive payments in July.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Jun; 8(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11183220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Restrictive SNF admission policies could place providers at risk, experts warn.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jan; 7(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 10345948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. HCFA still working on calculation of Part B add-ons for some providers.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Nov; 6(23):1-2. PubMed ID: 10187154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Industry group challenges HCFA guidance on link between MDS assessment, Medicare payment.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Dec; 6(24):1-3. PubMed ID: 10345228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
