133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10788302)
1. Lab discounts. How deep is too deep?
Dechene JC; Howton T
CAP Today; 2000 Mar; 14(3):42-4, 48. PubMed ID: 10788302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Referral charges: a bribe with another name.
Amalorpavanathan J
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(4):226-7. PubMed ID: 15372776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stark II rules and labs; lab fee rates overhaul.
Szabo J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 May; 34(5):60. PubMed ID: 12024704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed restrictions on physician referrals to clinical labs: important areas left unclarified.
Cooney PE
Healthspan; 1992 May; 9(5):3-7. PubMed ID: 10119529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding legal and regulatory pressure points in lab transactions.
Cockrell G; Walker B
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2012 May; 44(5):64. PubMed ID: 22649975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathology in New Zealand--a 1987 view.
Herdson PB
N Z Med J; 1988 Mar; 101(841):117-9. PubMed ID: 3380449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical pathologist. A physician's consultant.
Benjamin DR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1984 Oct; 108(10):782. PubMed ID: 6548119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interstate dermatopathology interpretations--50 separate licenses?
Olsen TG; Feeser TA; Jenkins PL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):454-7. PubMed ID: 15337991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seven forces reshaping the clinical laboratory.
Statland BE
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 May; 24(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 10118839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Society for pediatric pathology reference lab testing survey results.
Pacheco MC
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2013; 16(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 23075093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal issues for pathologists.
Wood JP
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Nov; 18(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 21993273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One in 8 physicians involved in Medicare is an investor in labs.
Johnson J
N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():1, 8. PubMed ID: 11647405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical laboratory in a competitive environment.
Markus GR
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1985 Mar; 17(3):71-2, 74. PubMed ID: 10271960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical compliance plan spells out duties of laboratories.
Roeder KH
Ga Hosp Today; 1997 May; 41(5):3. PubMed ID: 10169439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 1999 LeTourneau Award. An analysis of anti-kickback and self-referral law in modern health care.
Morrison AW
J Leg Med; 2000 Sep; 21(3):351-94. PubMed ID: 11055155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic health record donations by laboratories: is legal necessarily ethical?
Bercovitch L; Grant-Kels JM; Kels BD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Mar; 66(3):474-8. PubMed ID: 22342016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory kickbacks to doctors persist despite federal and state investigations.
Schorr B
Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1978 Sep; 58(241):40. PubMed ID: 10238424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Gambro settles Michigan anti-trust case, lab charges.
Nephrol News Issues; 2000 Aug; 14(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 11933430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratories clear first hurdle with House-passed Medicare bill.
Szabo J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Aug; 34(8):44. PubMed ID: 12228931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New CLIA regulations: they create a more complex definition for laboratories.
Riley J; Pristave R
Nephrol News Issues; 1992 May; 6(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 1407042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
