These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10788306)

  • 21. Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.
    Steinbrink C; Klatte M
    Dyslexia; 2008 Nov; 14(4):271-90. PubMed ID: 17979186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: masked priming effects.
    Castles A; Davis C; Cavalot P; Forster K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jul; 97(3):165-82. PubMed ID: 17408686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading.
    Juhasz BJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 14622063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma.
    Varsori M; Perez-Fornos A; Safran AB; Whatham AR
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2691-705. PubMed ID: 15358064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Oculomotor and linguistic determinants of reading development: a longitudinal study.
    Huestegge L; Radach R; Corbic D; Huestegge SM
    Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2948-59. PubMed ID: 19781566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Recognition and reading of upside down pictures and writing as a special ability of autistic children and adolescents].
    Kehrer HE; Morcher S
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr; 1987; 15(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 3442127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.
    Estes WK; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1003-18. PubMed ID: 12450328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry.
    Lubow RE; Tsal Y; Mirkin A; Mazliah G
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 8043265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Third and fifth graders' processing of parafoveal information in reading: A study in single-word recognition.
    Khelifi R; Sparrow L; Casalis S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():1-17. PubMed ID: 26057197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.
    Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Aguilera L; Owen WJ; Sears CR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):433-43. PubMed ID: 17258186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Young children's knowledge about printed names.
    Treiman R; Cohen J; Mulqueeny K; Kessler B; Schechtman S
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(5):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17883442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Elementary processes of information acquisition in reading].
    Radach R
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1994; 202(1):37-63. PubMed ID: 8053260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emerging neurophysiological specialization for letter strings.
    Maurer U; Brem S; Bucher K; Brandeis D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1532-52. PubMed ID: 16269095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing children's inference generation: what do tests of reading comprehension measure?
    Bowyer-Crane C; Snowling MJ
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Jun; 75(Pt 2):189-201. PubMed ID: 16033662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual and proprioceptive recognition of cursive letters in young children.
    Vinter A; Chartrel E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 18599004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impaired tuning of a fast occipito-temporal response for print in dyslexic children learning to read.
    Maurer U; Brem S; Bucher K; Kranz F; Benz R; Steinhausen HC; Brandeis D
    Brain; 2007 Dec; 130(Pt 12):3200-10. PubMed ID: 17728359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accounting for children's orthographic learning while reading text: do children self-teach?
    Cunningham AE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 16714031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.