These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10790026)

  • 1. Rigid piston approximation for computing the transfer function and angular response of a fiber-optic hydrophone.
    Krückler JF; Eisenberg A; Krix M; Lötsch R; Pessel M; Trier HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):1994-2003. PubMed ID: 10790026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acousto-optic, point receiver hydrophone probe for operation up to 100 MHz.
    Lewin PA; Mu C; Umchid S; Daryoush A; El-Sherif M
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Dec; 43(10):815-21. PubMed ID: 16054665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.
    Wear KA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):318-339. PubMed ID: 30530326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of a Reflectance-Based Fiber-Optic Hydrophone: Predictions From Theoretical Models Compared With Measurements.
    Wear KA; Howard SM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Dec; 65(12):2343-2348. PubMed ID: 30281445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Fabry-Perot fiber-optic ultrasonic hydrophone for the simultaneous measurement of temperature and acoustic pressure.
    Morris P; Hurrell A; Shaw A; Zhang E; Beard P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3611-22. PubMed ID: 19507943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.
    Wear KA; Liu Y; Harris GR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Feb; 65(2):137-148. PubMed ID: 29389648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of ultrasonic transducers using a fiberoptic sensor.
    Wu YQ; Shankar PM; Lewin PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 7810025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields.
    Parsons JE; Cain CA; Fowlkes JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1432-40. PubMed ID: 16583887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nominal Versus Actual Spatial Resolution: Comparison of Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size for Membrane, Needle, Capsule, and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones.
    Wear KA; Shah A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 36178990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation on the comparability of the light spot hydrophone and the fiber optic hydrophone in lithotripter field measurements.
    Rad AJ; Ueberle F; Krueger K
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2014 Jan; 85(1):014902. PubMed ID: 24517798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.
    Wear KA; Liu Y
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 30530327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Needle Hydrophones: Predictions From Four Theoretical Forms Compared With Measurements.
    Wear KA; Baker C; Miloro P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Oct; 65(10):1781-1788. PubMed ID: 30010557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.
    Wear KA; Howard SM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Sep; 66(9):1453-1464. PubMed ID: 31247548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of light spot hydrophone and fiber optic probe hydrophone for lithotripter field characterization.
    Smith N; Sankin GN; Simmons WN; Nanke R; Fehre J; Zhong P
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Jan; 83(1):014301. PubMed ID: 22299970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On fiber optic probe hydrophone measurements in a cavitating liquid.
    Zijlstra A; Ohl CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 18177133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angular response of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones.
    Shombert DG; Smith SW; Harris GR
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(4):484-92. PubMed ID: 7110078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz using time gating frequency analysis and finite amplitude waves.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
    Ultrasonics; 2003 Jun; 41(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 12782255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure compensated fiber laser hydrophone: modeling and experimentation.
    Chandrika UK; Pallayil V; Lim KM; Chew CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2710-8. PubMed ID: 24116409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic performance and clinical use of a fibreoptic hydrophone.
    Coleman AJ; Draguioti E; Tiptaf R; Shotri N; Saunders JE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Jan; 24(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 9483782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fiber-Optic Hydrophone Based on Michelson's Interferometer with Active Stabilization for Liquid Volume Measurement.
    Duque WS; Rodríguez Díaz CA; Leal-Junior AG; Frizera A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.