These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10790972)

  • 1. Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.
    Westerman DL
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Mar; 28(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 10790972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: familiarity versus recollection.
    Cameron TE; Hockley WE
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Mar; 28(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 10790973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interrupting recognition memory: tests of familiarity-based accounts of the revelation effect.
    Niewiadomski MW; Hockley WE
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Dec; 29(8):1130-8. PubMed ID: 11913749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altering the balance of recollection and familiarity influences the revelation effect.
    Landau JD
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 11641888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does familiarity change in the revelation effect?
    Verde MF; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 14516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials.
    Opitz B; Cornell S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1595-605. PubMed ID: 16989559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.
    Westerman DL; Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Mar; 24(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 9530844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests.
    Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):723-32. PubMed ID: 11394676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interrupting recognition memory: tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect.
    Hockley WE; Niewiadomski MW
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Dec; 29(8):1176-84. PubMed ID: 11913754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory.
    Guttentag RE; Carroll D
    Memory; 1994 Sep; 2(3):255-73. PubMed ID: 7584295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recollection reduces unitised familiarity effect.
    Shao H; Opitz B; Yang J; Weng X
    Memory; 2016; 24(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 25793354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1105-20. PubMed ID: 9747525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.
    LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 7791601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The revelation effect: moderating influences of encoding conditions and type of recognition test.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):866-70. PubMed ID: 18087951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manipulating the depth of processing reveals the relevance of second eye fixations for recollection but not familiarity.
    Schwedes C; Scherer D; Wentura D
    Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 31236764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.
    Yonelinas AP
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):747-63. PubMed ID: 9421560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic memory recognition is supported by intrinsic recollection-like processes: "The butcher on the bus" revisited.
    Waidergoren S; Segalowicz J; Gilboa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3573-87. PubMed ID: 23026798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of the feeling of resolution and recognition performance on the revelation effect.
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Oct; 45():100-108. PubMed ID: 27580461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.