These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10791118)
41. Supreme Court may be managed care's new best friend. Plunkett LR N Y State Dent J; 2000 Nov; 66(9):6-8. PubMed ID: 11143725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Shea v. Esensten ... another chapter in ERISA preemption? Rich CF Minn Med; 1998 Nov; 81(11):48-50. PubMed ID: 9842234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. ERISA and managed care: the law abhors a vacuum. Farrell MG J Health Hosp Law; 1996 Dec; 29(5):268-87. PubMed ID: 10164235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The Bill for Rights. Schneider CE Hastings Cent Rep; 2002; 32(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11917702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Patient advocacy and termination from managed care organizations. Do state laws protecting health care professional advocacy make any difference? Fentiman LC Neb Law Rev; 2003; 82(2):508-74. PubMed ID: 16514765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. New patient's rights: providers beware. Marren JP; Fine A Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):65-6. PubMed ID: 11155645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The class action suit as a method of patient empowerment in the managed care setting. Cerminara KL Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(1):7-58. PubMed ID: 9607103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability. Zinberg JM N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15651122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Emerging theories of liability for utilization review under ERISA health plans. Pomfret SD Tort Insur Law J; 1998; 34(1):131-66. PubMed ID: 10558440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Has the legal atmosphere for "managed care" forever changed? Impact of the limitations on ERISA. Kinderman K J Med Pract Manage; 2003; 19(2):100-1. PubMed ID: 14596175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Managed care plan liability legislation. Lederberg MB Med Health R I; 1998 Jul; 81(7):245-6. PubMed ID: 9689792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Sex discrimination and insurance for contraception. Law SA Wash Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 73(2):363-402. PubMed ID: 12465638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Employee Retirement Income Security Act and managed care: current issues and their impact on medical practice. Weiss LD; Martinez JA; LeCesne BG South Med J; 1999 Nov; 92(11):1049-53. PubMed ID: 10586829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Liability of managed care organizations expands. Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 10725048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Liability issues in managed care. Ellis MS J La State Med Soc; 1997 May; 149(5):151-8. PubMed ID: 9154751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Credentialing liability in the managed care arena. Michel CP Tort Insur Law J; 1999; 35(1):137-53. PubMed ID: 11475509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Ryland BK Manag Care Interface; 2004 Oct; 17(10):55-8. PubMed ID: 15535079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The Bipartisan Patient Protection Act: greater liability on managed care plans. Mayers UW Ann Health Law; 2003; 12(2):341-65, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12856463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]