These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10791284)

  • 1. The limits of reproductive technology: who decides?
    Agard ES; Wallach EE
    J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 10791284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproduction without sex--but with the doctor.
    Brody EB
    Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 3695576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach.
    Sedillo Lopez A
    Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy.
    Damelio J; Sorensen K
    Bioethics; 2008 Jun; 22(5):269-77. PubMed ID: 18447862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human in vitro fertilization: can we support it?
    Moore JW
    Christ Century; 1981 Apr; 98(13):442-6. PubMed ID: 11658298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preventive ethics approach to IVF in the age of octuplets.
    Rosenthal MS
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):339-40. PubMed ID: 20105464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. By the Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society.
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3 Suppl 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 3743811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive Ethics in Commercial Surrogacy: Decision-Making in IVF Clinics in New Delhi, India.
    Tanderup M; Reddy S; Patel T; Nielsen BB
    J Bioeth Inq; 2015 Sep; 12(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 26133889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproduction technology: cataloging the criticisms (Part II). The medical views. An ethics professor's view..
    Troup SB
    Ohio Med; 1988 Apr; 84(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 3283617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human in vitro fertilization.
    Skandhan KP; Skandhan S
    Panminerva Med; 1988; 30(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 3419855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reproduction medicine in the area spanning ethics and law].
    Hepp H
    Gynakologe; 1988 Mar; 21(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 3286392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Knapp RC; Caputo TA; Barber HR
    Cancer; 2004 Jan; 100(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 14716752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making babies: the state of the art.
    Blank RH
    Futurist; 1985 Feb; 19(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11649195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Artificial procreation: where do we stop?].
    Jobin-Howald U
    Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 1987 Feb; 80(2):44-6. PubMed ID: 3645146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical aspects of oocyte donation, in vitro fertilization surrogacy and reproductive cloning.
    Hovatta O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Nov; 79(11):921-4. PubMed ID: 11081671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Framing the ethical issues in new reproductive technologies.
    Newman LF
    Health Care Women Int; 1987; 8(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 3650267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care.
    Procaccino JA
    Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer and maybe a baby?
    Emanuel EJ; Powderly K
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(6):24; discussion 24-5. PubMed ID: 7860284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive technology: in France, debate and indecision.
    Fagot-Largeault A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S10-2. PubMed ID: 11644020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.